Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 1884914" data-attributes="member: 17296">I'd say it reduces the price... A smaller radius should generally reduce the price. And, of course, it's not *actually* an antimagic field (as I understand what you're asking about), but more simply a sword that's unaffected by magic. A sword unaffected by magic... which is why I'd say that the magically hardened skin would stay magically hardened. It's not going to unpolymorph someone, it's not going to affect that magic. However how do you justify that it does undo the magical reinforcements of armor? I'd say that the magic of armor is different, more inherent than a magically hardened skin. I mean, you're not going to magically get rid of the invisibility spell around the target either, you're not going to magically remove the curse they're afflicted by, and you're not going to remove the hardened skin. You are going to ignore their deflection bonus, their magical armor bonus... their mage armor and magic shield spell. Wall of force, cuts right through. Wall of stone? Clang...Just my opinion. I'd probably price it at about half the antimagic shell's cost. Because, really, as a fighter a sword with a permanent antimagic shell will do the trick even better. So very, very much better.</blockquote>