Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 1206331" data-attributes="member: 9037">Whenever we get into this discussions about paladins the argument about showing mercy versus smiting evil always comes up. Yes it says in the PHB that a paladin should punish evil doers but it does not say how he should punish them. Killing is just one way of punishing.Now in this situation I think the paladin made a few mistakes. One was not trying to follow what the cardinal asked of him and second being more blood thirsty than the barbarian.But these so called children were not innocents and they were dangerous so I think that the paladin should not be punished for what he did.Though I think players who bring a game to a screeching halt should be punished. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 1206331, member: 9037"] Whenever we get into this discussions about paladins the argument about showing mercy versus smiting evil always comes up. Yes it says in the PHB that a paladin should punish evil doers but it does not say how he should punish them. Killing is just one way of punishing. Now in this situation I think the paladin made a few mistakes. One was not trying to follow what the cardinal asked of him and second being more blood thirsty than the barbarian. But these so called children were not innocents and they were dangerous so I think that the paladin should not be punished for what he did. Though I think players who bring a game to a screeching halt should be punished. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification