Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Prickly moral situation for a Paladin - did I judge it correctly?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 1210020" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>True. I was under the assumption that, despite a few new posters who come in after reading the first few posts and say, "I think the paladin did fine," most of us have kind of moved on to more general discussions. You are right that the original situation was not, to the paladin, a moral quandry.</p><p></p><p>I would argue, however, that you are suggesting through tone and word choice that the DM was wrong/stupid for creating this encounter. Balance issues aside (and everyone has caught up with posts and knows that the children could only cast Dominate once every other round, with a DC14 save, as a collective group, right? Our fears of 24 Dominates per round were unfounded), it seemed like it <strong>did</strong> create a quandry, since various members of the party apparently disagreed over the best way to handle the situation. This means that, in my opinion, his attempt to create moral ambiguity for the <strong>group</strong> succeeded. If his attempt were to create moral ambiguity for the paladin in particular, then yeah, he failed. While this thread started as being about the paladin in particular (and, again, I agree that whacking the paladin for his decision, based on the info that the paladin had at the time, was not necessary), I would posit that, from the info that the DM gave us, this encounter was meant to be a morally ambiguous situation for the whole group -- in which case, it succeeded, up until it became a TPC. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 1210020, member: 5171"] True. I was under the assumption that, despite a few new posters who come in after reading the first few posts and say, "I think the paladin did fine," most of us have kind of moved on to more general discussions. You are right that the original situation was not, to the paladin, a moral quandry. I would argue, however, that you are suggesting through tone and word choice that the DM was wrong/stupid for creating this encounter. Balance issues aside (and everyone has caught up with posts and knows that the children could only cast Dominate once every other round, with a DC14 save, as a collective group, right? Our fears of 24 Dominates per round were unfounded), it seemed like it [b]did[/b] create a quandry, since various members of the party apparently disagreed over the best way to handle the situation. This means that, in my opinion, his attempt to create moral ambiguity for the [b]group[/b] succeeded. If his attempt were to create moral ambiguity for the paladin in particular, then yeah, he failed. While this thread started as being about the paladin in particular (and, again, I agree that whacking the paladin for his decision, based on the info that the paladin had at the time, was not necessary), I would posit that, from the info that the DM gave us, this encounter was meant to be a morally ambiguous situation for the whole group -- in which case, it succeeded, up until it became a TPC. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Prickly moral situation for a Paladin - did I judge it correctly?
Top