Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Prickly moral situation for a Paladin - did I judge it correctly?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 1211777" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>D&D posits a shallow idea of good and evil, where evil is actually Evil and can be pointed out in a trivial, non-ambiguous fashion. Making the world better consists of finding things that are Evil and destroying them.</p><p></p><p>Now, making aspects of life shallow can be a powerful way to think or talk about life, since it lets you explore certain ideas in greater depth or from a new viewpoint.</p><p></p><p>It does, however, remove the potential for moral quandaries from the game. If Evil is Evil and can be safely destroyed without concern for salvation, then there are no moral quandaries, except perhaps from time to time in choosing which Evil to take out first. Evil? Destroy. Not Evil? Protect.</p><p></p><p>So of course, any interpretation of the "dominating kids" story that is based on D&D morality gets to helpfully avoid any sort of moral quandary. The issue boils down to: </p><p>[code]if (kids == Evil) { </p><p> for each kid in kids {</p><p> Destroy (kid);}</p><p>}</p><p>else {</p><p> Protect (kids);</p><p>}[/code]</p><p>It's mechanical, devoid of quandariness, and, to me at least, dull.</p><p></p><p>Lots of people seem to be intent on doing a bunch of hand-waving to prove how simple an issue this is and how the paladin should have had no compunctions about chopping the little blighters in half.</p><p></p><p>My problem with this approach is that it takes all the FUN out of it. It's more exciting if it's a moral conundrum. It's more thrilling if the paladin doesn't know what to do, and, raging against the heartless fiend that made this necessary, weeping all the time, cuts down the children whose eyes only at the last minute shine with the innocence that was so long ago taken from them. Then, surrounded by bodies, swears never to rest until the demonic forces responsible are found and destroyed so that they can never again perpetrate such horrors.</p><p></p><p>Purple prose aside (I can never resist -- curse you, fiends of darkness!), this to me is a much more FUN story. Much more fun than "Detect Evil. Evil? Destroy."</p><p></p><p>Not saying it's BETTER, mind you. Just saying I find it more fun.</p><p></p><p>As long as it's backed up with the requisite amount of killing things and taking their stuff, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 1211777, member: 812"] D&D posits a shallow idea of good and evil, where evil is actually Evil and can be pointed out in a trivial, non-ambiguous fashion. Making the world better consists of finding things that are Evil and destroying them. Now, making aspects of life shallow can be a powerful way to think or talk about life, since it lets you explore certain ideas in greater depth or from a new viewpoint. It does, however, remove the potential for moral quandaries from the game. If Evil is Evil and can be safely destroyed without concern for salvation, then there are no moral quandaries, except perhaps from time to time in choosing which Evil to take out first. Evil? Destroy. Not Evil? Protect. So of course, any interpretation of the "dominating kids" story that is based on D&D morality gets to helpfully avoid any sort of moral quandary. The issue boils down to: [code]if (kids == Evil) { for each kid in kids { Destroy (kid);} } else { Protect (kids); }[/code] It's mechanical, devoid of quandariness, and, to me at least, dull. Lots of people seem to be intent on doing a bunch of hand-waving to prove how simple an issue this is and how the paladin should have had no compunctions about chopping the little blighters in half. My problem with this approach is that it takes all the FUN out of it. It's more exciting if it's a moral conundrum. It's more thrilling if the paladin doesn't know what to do, and, raging against the heartless fiend that made this necessary, weeping all the time, cuts down the children whose eyes only at the last minute shine with the innocence that was so long ago taken from them. Then, surrounded by bodies, swears never to rest until the demonic forces responsible are found and destroyed so that they can never again perpetrate such horrors. Purple prose aside (I can never resist -- curse you, fiends of darkness!), this to me is a much more FUN story. Much more fun than "Detect Evil. Evil? Destroy." Not saying it's BETTER, mind you. Just saying I find it more fun. As long as it's backed up with the requisite amount of killing things and taking their stuff, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Prickly moral situation for a Paladin - did I judge it correctly?
Top