Primal Power Cover at Amazon

[ravenheart]

I'd say it's a warden, perhaps utilizing a new water/sea based build (Guardian Might: Oceanbound, anyone?). In fact, I really hope it is, since I think it's one of the things that are missing from the Warden as is; too much focus on earth this and stone that - I want the fury of the friggin ocean! Fits thematically aswell.

 

[Keefe the Thief]

Thats an awesome cover all right - wtb.

Anyway, milking does no longer exist: if i do not buy the book i get all the crunch anyway sooner or later. So Wotc, milk away.

 

[Kishin]

You mean Sandstorm, Frostburn, and Stormwrack, right?

All three of which were amongst the best books published for 3E. There's so much material to mine in there, mechanically and fluffwise, it is almost ridiculous.

Also, I intensely dislike this cover. It looks silly. Terribly silly.

 

[Almacov]

All three of which were amongst the best books published for 3E. There's so much material to mine in there, mechanically and fluffwise, it is almost ridiculous.

I have to agree. Definitely some of the most satisfying stuff in my 3.5 library. That said, if they ever wind up publishing 4e equivalents, I hope they're much more DM-centric. Frankly, for me the PC material mostly just got in the way. Not that it was bad, just that it felt out of character with the rest of the book. I like how strong the divide is between PC and DM material in 4e for the most part.

As for the cover... I'd prefer to see the gnolls taking the tendons out of that fellow's legs. I like gnolls, but I hate that ridiculous character design, expression, and pose on the elf...

 

[Keefe the Thief]

I really like the shield the Gnoll has, it looks like something a Gnoll would use.

 

[Sir Brennen]

In this case though, Amazon's cover matches the one on the WotC product page.

Of course, the WotC site itself sometimes has placeholder art on those pages.