Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Problem] Too Many Players: Who Gets to Play?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyaricus" data-source="post: 3130836" data-attributes="member: 35678"><p>Actually, this occured to me last yeah. In the end I decided on the following system, which you proposed:</p><p></p><p>Do you know what's actually the nice thing about this? In the end, it's not about which of your friends/fellow gamers are least liked and who don't get to show up, but in fact who's most liked out of the group. There shouldn't be hard feelings in this, because everyone who going to show up are going to be the ones which the majority agree wiht deserve to be playing. It's a group agreeance, determined by majority.</p><p></p><p>I beleive you should do the following, with the above in mind. Have those two spots open to those two players who you <em>promised</em> would get a spot. Then, have a vote on who gets to fill the other 3 or 4 seats at your table. </p><p></p><p>So, you have 8 players, and each person should make a list numbered 1 to 7 on who they'd like to see be at the table with them. Top 3 or 4 people get to show up, the rest will get a chance next game.</p><p></p><p>Stuff like this is tough; in the end, it is going to be on the DMs shoulders (which sucks) but the system above (which your players and I have proposed) is likely the most democratic way of doing things.</p><p></p><p>Hope that helps, and good luck <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>cheers,</p><p>--N</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyaricus, post: 3130836, member: 35678"] Actually, this occured to me last yeah. In the end I decided on the following system, which you proposed: Do you know what's actually the nice thing about this? In the end, it's not about which of your friends/fellow gamers are least liked and who don't get to show up, but in fact who's most liked out of the group. There shouldn't be hard feelings in this, because everyone who going to show up are going to be the ones which the majority agree wiht deserve to be playing. It's a group agreeance, determined by majority. I beleive you should do the following, with the above in mind. Have those two spots open to those two players who you [i]promised[/i] would get a spot. Then, have a vote on who gets to fill the other 3 or 4 seats at your table. So, you have 8 players, and each person should make a list numbered 1 to 7 on who they'd like to see be at the table with them. Top 3 or 4 people get to show up, the rest will get a chance next game. Stuff like this is tough; in the end, it is going to be on the DMs shoulders (which sucks) but the system above (which your players and I have proposed) is likely the most democratic way of doing things. Hope that helps, and good luck :) cheers, --N [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Problem] Too Many Players: Who Gets to Play?
Top