Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Problems with removing attacks of opportunity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 5069277" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya</p><p></p><p> IMHO, you should go back to thinking like a 1e/2e DM. In other words, your "job" as DM is to run a fair and neutral game where common-sense is the overriding factor for all rules adjudications. </p><p></p><p> In the case of AoO...keep using them, but apply generous amounts of common sense to each and every one. This will result in AoO's that "make sense" happening, or at least having the potential to happen, while AoO's that "make no sense at all" will simply go *poof*. For example, a fighter is engaged in combat with an ogre. Suddenly, a kobold goes running behind him heading towards a door. As per the AoO, the fighter would get an AoO on the kobold who just ran behind him on his way to the door. However, this would entail the fighter turning 180 degrees, swinging at the kobold, then turning back 180 degrees...while the Ogre would apparently just stand there, waiting for the fighter to do his thing. Silliness I tell you! When you apply common sense to the situation, it changes. Suddenly the fighter *can* turn and swing at the kobold, but the DM should rule that the Ogre then gets an AoO against the back of the fighter. If the fighter player deems it worth it, he can, or he can let the kobold go and keep his focus on the ogre. </p><p></p><p> So, just apply common sense and have fun!</p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 5069277, member: 45197"] Hiya IMHO, you should go back to thinking like a 1e/2e DM. In other words, your "job" as DM is to run a fair and neutral game where common-sense is the overriding factor for all rules adjudications. In the case of AoO...keep using them, but apply generous amounts of common sense to each and every one. This will result in AoO's that "make sense" happening, or at least having the potential to happen, while AoO's that "make no sense at all" will simply go *poof*. For example, a fighter is engaged in combat with an ogre. Suddenly, a kobold goes running behind him heading towards a door. As per the AoO, the fighter would get an AoO on the kobold who just ran behind him on his way to the door. However, this would entail the fighter turning 180 degrees, swinging at the kobold, then turning back 180 degrees...while the Ogre would apparently just stand there, waiting for the fighter to do his thing. Silliness I tell you! When you apply common sense to the situation, it changes. Suddenly the fighter *can* turn and swing at the kobold, but the DM should rule that the Ogre then gets an AoO against the back of the fighter. If the fighter player deems it worth it, he can, or he can let the kobold go and keep his focus on the ogre. So, just apply common sense and have fun! ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Problems with removing attacks of opportunity?
Top