Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Proficiencies don't make the class. Do they?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 6611610" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Kamikaze covered my responses to this quite nicely, so I'll just say that I agree with what was said there. I also think that it's...humorous, to say that physical scores have no effect on RP while mental scores dramatically do. All stats affect RP--and at the same time, a character is not beholden to them either. You can totally make a character with crap-tastic Charisma who always tries to schmooze his way through things; they might be in deep denial about or simply oblivious to what others think of them, it's called being a blowhard. You can make a character with low Intelligence who strives to show off her wit and charm; that variably works out as a know-nothing who considers herself a know-it-all (like Shakespeare's Polonius) or a constant "malaproper" in TVTropes terms (like Juliet's nurse). And you can totally have a hyper-smart person who hates thinking, a strong or graceful person who is too lazy to make an effort, a charismatic misanthrope, etc. Stats define what you're <em>good</em> at doing, not what you <em>like</em> to do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Four, actually. Two at 3rd level, another at 10th, another at 17th. Unless you meant three for the vast majority of the game and for most groups, since levels 15+ are uncommon; that I would totally agree with.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The School of Metamagic might progress very slowly with the metamagic, though. And they could even (potentially) be different kinds of metamagic. For example, casting two different concentration spells would be a unique and powerful feature. Further, since this is a subclass component rather than a basal component, the progression could be smaller and slower: perhaps half as many points in total, and not allowing them to be used to recover spell slots (since the Wizard already has a feature for that).</p><p></p><p>And it's not like the "free metamagic" is actually much different anyway. Sculpt Spells is actually a <em>superior</em> form of Careful Spell, since it outright *excludes* targets/locations rather than enabling particular targets to auto-succeed saving throws. The fact that some schools already get abilities that are metamagic-like, but <em>better</em> AND without resource cost doesn't really persuade me that a "School of Metamagic" is such a problem.</p><p></p><p>I mean, just a couple months back, I'd bet most people would have been pretty skeptical of giving the Sorcerer not only extra spells known, when that is <em>specifically</em> one of the class's limitations, but further being able to *select* those spells via a bloody Cleric domain. Yet the designers were completely comfortable doing that. They--and you--don't seem to think that transferring domains, which is a major part of the Cleric, is a huge abrogation of the Cleric class. Why should transferring metamagic, which is apparently a major part of the Sorcerer, be that much different?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Given how many people are specifically harping the limited number of spells known to the Sorcerer, and the nearly immediate fan reaction that the new Sorcerer origins are a major power boost <em>specifically because</em> they get free spells known, I'm not so sure I agree with you here. And then the new ones even get straight-up improvements on what the original origins got (e.g. the Storm Sorc's flight feature is pretty much out-and-out better than the Dragon Sorc's, what with the party buff element).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 6611610, member: 6790260"] Kamikaze covered my responses to this quite nicely, so I'll just say that I agree with what was said there. I also think that it's...humorous, to say that physical scores have no effect on RP while mental scores dramatically do. All stats affect RP--and at the same time, a character is not beholden to them either. You can totally make a character with crap-tastic Charisma who always tries to schmooze his way through things; they might be in deep denial about or simply oblivious to what others think of them, it's called being a blowhard. You can make a character with low Intelligence who strives to show off her wit and charm; that variably works out as a know-nothing who considers herself a know-it-all (like Shakespeare's Polonius) or a constant "malaproper" in TVTropes terms (like Juliet's nurse). And you can totally have a hyper-smart person who hates thinking, a strong or graceful person who is too lazy to make an effort, a charismatic misanthrope, etc. Stats define what you're [I]good[/I] at doing, not what you [I]like[/I] to do. Four, actually. Two at 3rd level, another at 10th, another at 17th. Unless you meant three for the vast majority of the game and for most groups, since levels 15+ are uncommon; that I would totally agree with. The School of Metamagic might progress very slowly with the metamagic, though. And they could even (potentially) be different kinds of metamagic. For example, casting two different concentration spells would be a unique and powerful feature. Further, since this is a subclass component rather than a basal component, the progression could be smaller and slower: perhaps half as many points in total, and not allowing them to be used to recover spell slots (since the Wizard already has a feature for that). And it's not like the "free metamagic" is actually much different anyway. Sculpt Spells is actually a [I]superior[/I] form of Careful Spell, since it outright *excludes* targets/locations rather than enabling particular targets to auto-succeed saving throws. The fact that some schools already get abilities that are metamagic-like, but [I]better[/I] AND without resource cost doesn't really persuade me that a "School of Metamagic" is such a problem. I mean, just a couple months back, I'd bet most people would have been pretty skeptical of giving the Sorcerer not only extra spells known, when that is [I]specifically[/I] one of the class's limitations, but further being able to *select* those spells via a bloody Cleric domain. Yet the designers were completely comfortable doing that. They--and you--don't seem to think that transferring domains, which is a major part of the Cleric, is a huge abrogation of the Cleric class. Why should transferring metamagic, which is apparently a major part of the Sorcerer, be that much different? Given how many people are specifically harping the limited number of spells known to the Sorcerer, and the nearly immediate fan reaction that the new Sorcerer origins are a major power boost [I]specifically because[/I] they get free spells known, I'm not so sure I agree with you here. And then the new ones even get straight-up improvements on what the original origins got (e.g. the Storm Sorc's flight feature is pretty much out-and-out better than the Dragon Sorc's, what with the party buff element). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Proficiencies don't make the class. Do they?
Top