Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Progressing character backgrounds as the campaign progresses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="howandwhy99" data-source="post: 2793141" data-attributes="member: 3192"><p>Basically, I'm asking what you think as a DM about players who continue to create their PC's background as the campaign progresses. Do you allow it? Do you think it hurts your games? helps them? what do think?</p><p>(Yes, this thread was inspired by the "What's an "interesting" character anyway?" thread)</p><p></p><p>=-=-=</p><p></p><p>If you're looking for more detail, here is an example. Personally, I would start the game with a fairly generic background at 1st level with a couple plot hooks for the DM to play with.</p><p></p><p>This should be enough fodder for a good DM to create any number of things, a price on his head (as an escaped slave), a foe (Vorl the Mad), or even a quest (to find his lost family), just to mention a few. All these can be dropped in subtly during game without overshadowing whatever else is going on in the campaign.</p><p></p><p>But later, maybe I'm getting bored or some of these plot hooks have played themselves out, I progress the background. Generally I just fill in gaps that weren't included above, but are really aimed at cool things I think would be fun to do.</p><p></p><p>Here I'm not really telling the DM to do anything, but I'm hoping he will include Vecna in the campaign and perhaps a tie between my PC and him - something suitably ominous. I could have put in a much more obvious tie in, like a gift from the Harpers, or a treasure map leading to some place called "Acererak". </p><p></p><p>I hope you get the gist. The character is developed both ingame and by writing extra backgrounds that expand on his youth. Now, if I can simply go and do what interests me in game, I prefer that method, but long lost siblings, forgotten alien abductions, even past ties to an organization the PC might want to join, I think can all be accomplished using additional backgrounds.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, I could see this done poorly. Another example:</p><p></p><p>I think this is okay. But later the player adds on:</p><p></p><p>This is a little overdone, but I hope you get the point. If the DM doesn't ratchet down this PC and lose the endless questing, Hytotimous is going to overwhelm whatever the rest of the party wants to do. In fact, they're might end up following the "chosen one" around for the rest of the campaign.</p><p></p><p>So,</p><p>- If some players use only in-game events to progress their character, are they shortchanged when others use extra backgrounds to progress more? </p><p>- What of the potential of manipulating the campaign world of the DM by including things a player would normally have no control over, be it Vecna or Zorb above. </p><p>- Is this the player's purview - his background, a concern of the DM's to allow only certain backgrounds, or maybe all the players who are the ones who actually choose what the group does?</p><p></p><p>To reiterate, What do you think about PC backgrounds progressing along with the campaign? Would you simply veto portions you didn't like or remove them altogether? In my experience these are normally attempts by the player to reinvest their interest in the game. I think they also have the potential to add to the experience for everyone.</p><p></p><p>I used to give the advice, "If you're bored with your current character, spice up their background and include hooks you are interesting in doing." Perhaps it should be the standard, "start a new character" instead? This is difficult in one of my games as new characters always start at 1st.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="howandwhy99, post: 2793141, member: 3192"] Basically, I'm asking what you think as a DM about players who continue to create their PC's background as the campaign progresses. Do you allow it? Do you think it hurts your games? helps them? what do think? (Yes, this thread was inspired by the "What's an "interesting" character anyway?" thread) =-=-= If you're looking for more detail, here is an example. Personally, I would start the game with a fairly generic background at 1st level with a couple plot hooks for the DM to play with. This should be enough fodder for a good DM to create any number of things, a price on his head (as an escaped slave), a foe (Vorl the Mad), or even a quest (to find his lost family), just to mention a few. All these can be dropped in subtly during game without overshadowing whatever else is going on in the campaign. But later, maybe I'm getting bored or some of these plot hooks have played themselves out, I progress the background. Generally I just fill in gaps that weren't included above, but are really aimed at cool things I think would be fun to do. Here I'm not really telling the DM to do anything, but I'm hoping he will include Vecna in the campaign and perhaps a tie between my PC and him - something suitably ominous. I could have put in a much more obvious tie in, like a gift from the Harpers, or a treasure map leading to some place called "Acererak". I hope you get the gist. The character is developed both ingame and by writing extra backgrounds that expand on his youth. Now, if I can simply go and do what interests me in game, I prefer that method, but long lost siblings, forgotten alien abductions, even past ties to an organization the PC might want to join, I think can all be accomplished using additional backgrounds. On the other hand, I could see this done poorly. Another example: I think this is okay. But later the player adds on: This is a little overdone, but I hope you get the point. If the DM doesn't ratchet down this PC and lose the endless questing, Hytotimous is going to overwhelm whatever the rest of the party wants to do. In fact, they're might end up following the "chosen one" around for the rest of the campaign. So, - If some players use only in-game events to progress their character, are they shortchanged when others use extra backgrounds to progress more? - What of the potential of manipulating the campaign world of the DM by including things a player would normally have no control over, be it Vecna or Zorb above. - Is this the player's purview - his background, a concern of the DM's to allow only certain backgrounds, or maybe all the players who are the ones who actually choose what the group does? To reiterate, What do you think about PC backgrounds progressing along with the campaign? Would you simply veto portions you didn't like or remove them altogether? In my experience these are normally attempts by the player to reinvest their interest in the game. I think they also have the potential to add to the experience for everyone. I used to give the advice, "If you're bored with your current character, spice up their background and include hooks you are interesting in doing." Perhaps it should be the standard, "start a new character" instead? This is difficult in one of my games as new characters always start at 1st. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Progressing character backgrounds as the campaign progresses
Top