Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Prone=Flatfooted?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 4738791" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>No, a dex penalty is listed AS BEING a dex penalty. The penalty to AC for being prone is UNNAMED. Strictly speaking all that means in game terms is that it stacks with other unnamed penalties.</p><p> </p><p>AC is not limited to representing the hardness and body coverage that the armor provides, but neither is it solely representative of an ability to avoid being hit. It really is an amalgamation of various factors into one number - which is then modified by other, typically more specific factors such as how special materials used in the armor increase the bonus, dexterity adjustment, magic, etc.</p><p> </p><p>The penalty for being prone does have a lot to do with being less able to dodge blows, but also it's because you are in a physical position where armor simply will not provide the same protection as it would if you and your opponent were both standing. The blows will come from directions that the armor is not designed to protect against. The dodging advantages granted by a dexterity bonus are NOT affected, but you ARE at a physical disadvantage.</p><p> </p><p>I'd suggest that attempting to squeeze out an advantage by <em>reinterpretation</em> of rules is likely to just lead to butting heads with the DM.</p><p> </p><p>If you get an opponent prone you not only then get to attack with him at a -4 to his AC, but if/when he tries to stand up he draws an AOO. Trying to declare that this actually is INTENDED to equate to loss of dex bonus, being flatfooted, or otherwise enabling sneak attack is DEEP into house rules territory. Argue it if you like - but the ONLY person qualified to declare your argument valid is YOUR DM. And I wouldn't expect your DM to agree. Their likely to insist that the defined advantages of having your opponent prone are sufficient. You would do better to scour sourcebooks for feats that DO deny an opponent their dex bonus. I seem to recall that there IS a feat somewhere that can render an opponent flatfooted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 4738791, member: 32740"] No, a dex penalty is listed AS BEING a dex penalty. The penalty to AC for being prone is UNNAMED. Strictly speaking all that means in game terms is that it stacks with other unnamed penalties. AC is not limited to representing the hardness and body coverage that the armor provides, but neither is it solely representative of an ability to avoid being hit. It really is an amalgamation of various factors into one number - which is then modified by other, typically more specific factors such as how special materials used in the armor increase the bonus, dexterity adjustment, magic, etc. The penalty for being prone does have a lot to do with being less able to dodge blows, but also it's because you are in a physical position where armor simply will not provide the same protection as it would if you and your opponent were both standing. The blows will come from directions that the armor is not designed to protect against. The dodging advantages granted by a dexterity bonus are NOT affected, but you ARE at a physical disadvantage. I'd suggest that attempting to squeeze out an advantage by [I]reinterpretation[/I] of rules is likely to just lead to butting heads with the DM. If you get an opponent prone you not only then get to attack with him at a -4 to his AC, but if/when he tries to stand up he draws an AOO. Trying to declare that this actually is INTENDED to equate to loss of dex bonus, being flatfooted, or otherwise enabling sneak attack is DEEP into house rules territory. Argue it if you like - but the ONLY person qualified to declare your argument valid is YOUR DM. And I wouldn't expect your DM to agree. Their likely to insist that the defined advantages of having your opponent prone are sufficient. You would do better to scour sourcebooks for feats that DO deny an opponent their dex bonus. I seem to recall that there IS a feat somewhere that can render an opponent flatfooted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Prone=Flatfooted?
Top