Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PROOF that Empower Spell should not be allowed to stack with itself!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 318891" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Uhm... you only multiply the variable portion of the die, not the fixed portion.</p><p></p><p>d4 has a minimum of 1, which times 1.5 results in 1.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I know the example in the PHB is misleading, but the rule is:</p><p></p><p>"All variable, numeric effects of an empowered spell are increased by one-half."</p><p></p><p>And yes, I also realize that a lot of people do not play it that way. They read the sentence "An empowered spell deals half again as much damage as normal, cures half again as many hit points, affects half again as many targets, etc., as appropriate." as indicating that the feat actually affects the non-variable portion of the result.</p><p></p><p>For example, Empowered D8+5 Cure Light Wounds becomes 9 to 19 points of curing. And, that is ok, if that is how you read the feat.</p><p></p><p>But, there are many ways to interpret it. We have always used the strict interpretation (#1 below), however, as per my earlier post, we decided to go with yet another interpretation. So, several interpretations are:</p><p></p><p>1) half variable portion of each die round down</p><p>2) half variable portion of total dice round down</p><p>3) half entire portion (i.e. variable plus fixed) of each die round down</p><p>4) half entire portion of total dice round down</p><p></p><p>But, now that I have thought about it some more, maybe I will go with #4 which ends up really combining my #1 and #2 from my earlier post due to the +1 fixed portion on most single die spells.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 318891, member: 2011"] Uhm... you only multiply the variable portion of the die, not the fixed portion. d4 has a minimum of 1, which times 1.5 results in 1. And yes, I know the example in the PHB is misleading, but the rule is: "All variable, numeric effects of an empowered spell are increased by one-half." And yes, I also realize that a lot of people do not play it that way. They read the sentence "An empowered spell deals half again as much damage as normal, cures half again as many hit points, affects half again as many targets, etc., as appropriate." as indicating that the feat actually affects the non-variable portion of the result. For example, Empowered D8+5 Cure Light Wounds becomes 9 to 19 points of curing. And, that is ok, if that is how you read the feat. But, there are many ways to interpret it. We have always used the strict interpretation (#1 below), however, as per my earlier post, we decided to go with yet another interpretation. So, several interpretations are: 1) half variable portion of each die round down 2) half variable portion of total dice round down 3) half entire portion (i.e. variable plus fixed) of each die round down 4) half entire portion of total dice round down But, now that I have thought about it some more, maybe I will go with #4 which ends up really combining my #1 and #2 from my earlier post due to the +1 fixed portion on most single die spells. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PROOF that Empower Spell should not be allowed to stack with itself!
Top