Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PROOF that Empower Spell should not be allowed to stack with itself!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr_Rictus" data-source="post: 319410" data-attributes="member: 850"><p>Nah, the average damage given the miss chance is a poor statistic because it's the one situation you're basically sure <em>doesn't</em> apply. There aren't going to be enough events for it to average out.</p><p></p><p>50% chance, the wizard ends up with a bunch of the fighter's hit points and can (sort of) stand up to his counterattack, 50% chance he doesn't and is killed by the fighter trivially.</p><p></p><p>By the way, should the <em>fighter</em> be taking a miss chance for his <em>blink</em>, or is his <em>vorpal sword</em> also <em>ghost touch</em> or something?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>With 4 attacks each having a 20% chance to critical, the chance that at least one of them does so is actually about 59%. Which is more comfortable for the wizard, but still not exactly cozy.</p><p></p><p>So, for the wizard to survive, he has to hit the fighter (50% chance) and not be decapitated by any of the counterattacks (41% chance). So there's about a 20% chance he even gets as far as his attempt to <em>power word, kill</em> the fighter. </p><p></p><p>Which, I might point out, kind of counts on him (A) getting the fighter to below 100 hit points (likely, but not guaranteed just by the fact that average damage would do it), and (B) <em>knowing</em> that the fighter is at under 100 hit points, which is actually something he is obliged to guess about. He only has to roll a 28 or less on his 10d6 and the fighter is left with more than 100 hit points. This is actually a pretty good bet for the wizard (about 90%).</p><p></p><p>So, offhand, it looks like the wizard's chance of succeeding with this strategy, given all of the independent factors that could go wrong, is in the neighborhood of 18%</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr_Rictus, post: 319410, member: 850"] Nah, the average damage given the miss chance is a poor statistic because it's the one situation you're basically sure [i]doesn't[/i] apply. There aren't going to be enough events for it to average out. 50% chance, the wizard ends up with a bunch of the fighter's hit points and can (sort of) stand up to his counterattack, 50% chance he doesn't and is killed by the fighter trivially. By the way, should the [i]fighter[/i] be taking a miss chance for his [i]blink[/i], or is his [i]vorpal sword[/i] also [i]ghost touch[/i] or something? With 4 attacks each having a 20% chance to critical, the chance that at least one of them does so is actually about 59%. Which is more comfortable for the wizard, but still not exactly cozy. So, for the wizard to survive, he has to hit the fighter (50% chance) and not be decapitated by any of the counterattacks (41% chance). So there's about a 20% chance he even gets as far as his attempt to [i]power word, kill[/i] the fighter. Which, I might point out, kind of counts on him (A) getting the fighter to below 100 hit points (likely, but not guaranteed just by the fact that average damage would do it), and (B) [i]knowing[/i] that the fighter is at under 100 hit points, which is actually something he is obliged to guess about. He only has to roll a 28 or less on his 10d6 and the fighter is left with more than 100 hit points. This is actually a pretty good bet for the wizard (about 90%). So, offhand, it looks like the wizard's chance of succeeding with this strategy, given all of the independent factors that could go wrong, is in the neighborhood of 18% [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
PROOF that Empower Spell should not be allowed to stack with itself!
Top