Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 320384" data-attributes="member: 2829">Re: kreynoldsI'm sorry? I don't follow.Disrespecting? Insulting?Actually, the primary thing you provided was an argument based upon house rules, so it isn't valid at all. It doesn't really matter how great you think those house rules are. They're still house rules, and there is a separate forum for that.Oh! I see! No, no, no. That wasn't intended as an insult at all, not a personal one anyway. I apologize if it seemed like that, but it wasn't intended. It's more just a poke.Well...I can't see why, but OK.I wasn't flaming you, and if you took it that way, then I apologize. I just like those feats because I find them funny, and they are meant as satire. If you took it personal, which you obviously did, all I can say is...damn...that's not what I intended.Like I said, insulting you wasn't my intent, and I'm pretty surprised that you're taking it this badly, but again, my bad. Although, I can't help but wonder if you are taking those feats as an insult because of my comments against your argument in the house rules thread.Uhhh...right.Nobody's perfect, and some people take things way too seriously.You lost me.That's debateable. It depends on your perspective.I get the feeling that you are more than a little upset that I, and a few others, completely debunked your argument because you were using a set of house rules created by someone that you respect a great deal. Perhaps in your eyes, having those house rules thrown right out the window in a rules thread is disrespectful to said individual. Please understand that it was not disrespect, as those house rules simply do not belong in this discussion in the first place.One last time, please understand that I intended no direct malicious insult. If you read those feats over again, I'm sure you'll find that they're pretty rediculous and can't even really be literally applied to you at all, nor could they be applied to most people.It is quite obvious that you are truly upset, and I'm pretty sure that you're not B.S.'ing me. So, I will apologize for two things:1) I sorry that my post offended you so badly (though why, exactly, I'm not entirely sure).2) I'm sorry you got upset.It was my attempt to inject a little reprieve into this dying thread. Perhaps that was a bad idea. But please, try not to take things so seriously or personally. I don't "flame" people without good reason, and in this case, I had no reason to "flame" you, which is why I didn't.However, given all the pieces of this puzzle (the house rules, your tremendous respect for the author of those rules, your apparent insulting from my feats, your staunch defense of your argument that isn't based upon the rules, etc), I find your  reaction confusing. Nevertheless, I apologize for any permanent harm I might have caused you.</blockquote>

Verification