Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
[proposal] Adjustments to the character approval process.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Someone" data-source="post: 5484699" data-attributes="member: 5656"><p>First a disclaimer: Character is a process that takes really long. This is not a complaint, it’s a fact. I don’t think it’s the judges fault: I know they do what they can and more, but 4e characters are so full of fiddly details and obscure sources that fully reviewing a character is quite time consuming. This proposal is intended to actually reduce the number of characters that need approval and therefore reducing the workload on judges.</p><p></p><p>Proposed approval process:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Benefits of this system</strong>: Judges won’t have to deal with 1st level character submissions, <em>only with acharacters that complete an adventure</em> so if some day you think for whatever reason a minotaur swordmage would be a neat idea and hastily make it on the CB they won’t need to waste time judging that character that most likely won’t see any adventure.</p><p></p><p>Many (I daresay most) 1st level characters start adventuring without approval, and receive it as they finish the adventure and experience is awarded. The proposal fits the rules to reality, and at least makes sure the characters get some polishing, even if it doesn’t come from a judge.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, for higher level characters they’ll receive the same level of attention they get right now, as they’ll need a judge and a non judge review to be fully approved and be able to earn experience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Someone, post: 5484699, member: 5656"] First a disclaimer: Character is a process that takes really long. This is not a complaint, it’s a fact. I don’t think it’s the judges fault: I know they do what they can and more, but 4e characters are so full of fiddly details and obscure sources that fully reviewing a character is quite time consuming. This proposal is intended to actually reduce the number of characters that need approval and therefore reducing the workload on judges. Proposed approval process: [b]Benefits of this system[/b]: Judges won’t have to deal with 1st level character submissions, [i]only with acharacters that complete an adventure[/i] so if some day you think for whatever reason a minotaur swordmage would be a neat idea and hastily make it on the CB they won’t need to waste time judging that character that most likely won’t see any adventure. Many (I daresay most) 1st level characters start adventuring without approval, and receive it as they finish the adventure and experience is awarded. The proposal fits the rules to reality, and at least makes sure the characters get some polishing, even if it doesn’t come from a judge. Lastly, for higher level characters they’ll receive the same level of attention they get right now, as they’ll need a judge and a non judge review to be fully approved and be able to earn experience. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
[proposal] Adjustments to the character approval process.
Top