Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
proposal: adopt LEB's rules on treasure and retirement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 5313502" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Sorry, but I strongly disagree with this. I don't think it should be on the players' shoulders to initiate a potential conflict with a DM just to have balanced treasure. Besides that, it could easily appear rude or disrespectful to say "why am I so far behind in loots?" or "I don't like what you're giving me". No, I dislike putting the onus on the player to correct the DM - especially when something can be easily codified to take care of it.</p><p></p><p>I completely agree.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Please don't think I'm trying to say "DMs are jerks" or something else that would imply such a thing as a "rogue DM". Nothing is further from the truth. Everyone on these boards tries hard and does a good job and is never intentionally jerky just to be a jerk. We have a good community and I like being a part of it.</p><p></p><p>What I <em>am</em> saying is that it is close to impossible for every DM to keep up with loot levels for every player in every game. I know it's close to impossible because there are instances where it isn't happening. This isn't because someone is a jerk, it's because it's too difficult and too time consuming and let's face it: this is our hobby, not our job. So let's make it easier on the DMs and better for the players and simpler for all.</p><p></p><p>Does this lose some level of control for the DMs? Yes. Is it much worse than having a wishlist anyway? I don't think so. I don't think the sky is falling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 5313502, member: 9789"] Sorry, but I strongly disagree with this. I don't think it should be on the players' shoulders to initiate a potential conflict with a DM just to have balanced treasure. Besides that, it could easily appear rude or disrespectful to say "why am I so far behind in loots?" or "I don't like what you're giving me". No, I dislike putting the onus on the player to correct the DM - especially when something can be easily codified to take care of it. I completely agree. Please don't think I'm trying to say "DMs are jerks" or something else that would imply such a thing as a "rogue DM". Nothing is further from the truth. Everyone on these boards tries hard and does a good job and is never intentionally jerky just to be a jerk. We have a good community and I like being a part of it. What I [I]am[/I] saying is that it is close to impossible for every DM to keep up with loot levels for every player in every game. I know it's close to impossible because there are instances where it isn't happening. This isn't because someone is a jerk, it's because it's too difficult and too time consuming and let's face it: this is our hobby, not our job. So let's make it easier on the DMs and better for the players and simpler for all. Does this lose some level of control for the DMs? Yes. Is it much worse than having a wishlist anyway? I don't think so. I don't think the sky is falling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
proposal: adopt LEB's rules on treasure and retirement
Top