Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living Eberron
PROPOSAL: Allow Non-Kalashtar to "initiate" the conversation...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maidhc O Casain" data-source="post: 5037735" data-attributes="member: 29558"><p>As a player in the Moonwatch adventure, I have a 'horse in the race.' As KD has pointed out, this seems to be actually a roll play dispute rather than a rules dispute. True, Kalidrev is the one who made it a proposal - because it was pointed out that, while the discussion remained civil, it was going nowhere, really.</p><p></p><p>While this <strong>could</strong> be made into a rules issue (actually <strong>has</strong> been, I guess, with the proposal), it <strong>shouldn't</strong> be; in my opinion, the rules are 'light' for a reason - to allow the GM to mold the adventure to the group, and to what he intends for the adventure.</p><p></p><p>So my two cents in the pot is: leave this one up to the GM.</p><p></p><p>[sblock=Aside]I'm not sure where this should go, but it seems somewhat pertinent to the discussion, so . . .</p><p></p><p>KD, you are a <em>great</em> roll player, from what I've seen. And I agree 100% with your take on OOC vs. IC play. </p><p></p><p>But I also believe that as a late addition to the group it's my responsibility to fit myself to the style of the group rather than trying to mold the group to my own preferences.</p><p></p><p>I knew what I was getting into before I signed up - I had the entire history of the game available through the old posts. I knew going in that tactics were being discussed OOC, and that Telepathy was being used 'fast and loose.' So, I make the choice NOT to do so, and try my best to base my character's actions on what he knows.</p><p></p><p>But it's not my place to come in and tell the rest of the group to change the way they've been playing - especially when the group has been cohesive and having a good time. And it's not my place to tell the GM to change the way he's been running the game - especially when the game has been going successfully and everyone's been having a good time.</p><p></p><p>Again, I have <em>tremendous</em> respect for your roll play abilities and your knowledge of the rules, and for your integrity when it comes to playing your character. But even though it's in a different forum (OOC rather then IC) this seems like another attempt to get the GM and players in an established game (with a cohesive group where everyone was enjoying themselves), one that you had ample opportunity to examine prior to joining, to change the way they're playing.[/sblock]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maidhc O Casain, post: 5037735, member: 29558"] As a player in the Moonwatch adventure, I have a 'horse in the race.' As KD has pointed out, this seems to be actually a roll play dispute rather than a rules dispute. True, Kalidrev is the one who made it a proposal - because it was pointed out that, while the discussion remained civil, it was going nowhere, really. While this [B]could[/B] be made into a rules issue (actually [B]has[/B] been, I guess, with the proposal), it [B]shouldn't[/B] be; in my opinion, the rules are 'light' for a reason - to allow the GM to mold the adventure to the group, and to what he intends for the adventure. So my two cents in the pot is: leave this one up to the GM. [sblock=Aside]I'm not sure where this should go, but it seems somewhat pertinent to the discussion, so . . . KD, you are a [I]great[/I] roll player, from what I've seen. And I agree 100% with your take on OOC vs. IC play. But I also believe that as a late addition to the group it's my responsibility to fit myself to the style of the group rather than trying to mold the group to my own preferences. I knew what I was getting into before I signed up - I had the entire history of the game available through the old posts. I knew going in that tactics were being discussed OOC, and that Telepathy was being used 'fast and loose.' So, I make the choice NOT to do so, and try my best to base my character's actions on what he knows. But it's not my place to come in and tell the rest of the group to change the way they've been playing - especially when the group has been cohesive and having a good time. And it's not my place to tell the GM to change the way he's been running the game - especially when the game has been going successfully and everyone's been having a good time. Again, I have [I]tremendous[/I] respect for your roll play abilities and your knowledge of the rules, and for your integrity when it comes to playing your character. But even though it's in a different forum (OOC rather then IC) this seems like another attempt to get the GM and players in an established game (with a cohesive group where everyone was enjoying themselves), one that you had ample opportunity to examine prior to joining, to change the way they're playing.[/sblock] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living Eberron
PROPOSAL: Allow Non-Kalashtar to "initiate" the conversation...
Top