Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living Eberron
PROPOSAL: Allow Non-Kalashtar to "initiate" the conversation...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kalidrev" data-source="post: 5037818" data-attributes="member: 84005"><p>KD,</p><p></p><p>I disagree that this proposal would make Group Mind worthless. The racial ability gives one-on-one, two-way communication. The second gives the entire group one-on-group, multi-way communication. We may have played the Telepathy "fast and loose" in Trouble in Moonwatch, but I do not believe I ever had Lan use telepathy to relay IC information to all party members at once during a battle. Yes, out of battle I had Lan relay information to all party members, but I simply neglected (or chose not, depending on how you see it) to say that I was relaying it one-on-one to each member (mostly for brevity's sake). If you can supply a time that I did this in combat, then I apologize for my mistakes. </p><p></p><p>Like you, I do not believe that the Telepathy racial ability should be used to facilitate conversation between all party members at once (at least until the Group Mind feat has been taken by the kalashtar in the party). It would be nice if we had a concrete answer from WOTC on this one, but since most people disregard what Customer Service says anyways (ask twice, get three different answers and all that), the ruling will have to fall on the judges.</p><p></p><p>I resent the fact that you think I am trying to FORCE DMs to do anything. I simply want a resolution to a question that at least you and I have had. I, too, tend to be rather rules aware, but when no explicit rules have been presented on a particular item, I do not believe that implicit rules can be or should be used as written in stone. This is because, as has been proven by this discussion, there are multiple interpretations of how this racial ability should work. Neither side is right or wrong, currently, as there has been no official ruling on this by either WOTC or our Judges. Once this happens, then we can both play by the rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kalidrev, post: 5037818, member: 84005"] KD, I disagree that this proposal would make Group Mind worthless. The racial ability gives one-on-one, two-way communication. The second gives the entire group one-on-group, multi-way communication. We may have played the Telepathy "fast and loose" in Trouble in Moonwatch, but I do not believe I ever had Lan use telepathy to relay IC information to all party members at once during a battle. Yes, out of battle I had Lan relay information to all party members, but I simply neglected (or chose not, depending on how you see it) to say that I was relaying it one-on-one to each member (mostly for brevity's sake). If you can supply a time that I did this in combat, then I apologize for my mistakes. Like you, I do not believe that the Telepathy racial ability should be used to facilitate conversation between all party members at once (at least until the Group Mind feat has been taken by the kalashtar in the party). It would be nice if we had a concrete answer from WOTC on this one, but since most people disregard what Customer Service says anyways (ask twice, get three different answers and all that), the ruling will have to fall on the judges. I resent the fact that you think I am trying to FORCE DMs to do anything. I simply want a resolution to a question that at least you and I have had. I, too, tend to be rather rules aware, but when no explicit rules have been presented on a particular item, I do not believe that implicit rules can be or should be used as written in stone. This is because, as has been proven by this discussion, there are multiple interpretations of how this racial ability should work. Neither side is right or wrong, currently, as there has been no official ruling on this by either WOTC or our Judges. Once this happens, then we can both play by the rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living Eberron
PROPOSAL: Allow Non-Kalashtar to "initiate" the conversation...
Top