Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Velmont" data-source="post: 4977279" data-attributes="member: 13739">Yeah, because it is a Flaming Weapon. I doubt it refer to the keyword weapon. I think you should read it like this:Flaming Dagger:&nbsp; 'with this dagger'Flaming Sword:&nbsp; 'with this sword'Flaming Axe:&nbsp; 'with this axe'etc...And in that case, you could argue that hitting with a power with Implement keyword through a dagger used as an implement fill the needed to use the power.I will say, the only thing that make me think you are right, it is the FAQ. Nothing else go against using a power from a weapon use as an implement on an implement keyword power. And what annoy me in the FAQ, it is the example of weapon they used are weapon not meant at start to be implement, that allow to be use as implement, and non have an item power that are use in conjunction with a class power.That's what they should clarify.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Velmont, post: 4977279, member: 13739"] Yeah, because it is a Flaming [B]Weapon[/B]. I doubt it refer to the keyword weapon. I think you should read it like this: Flaming [COLOR="Red"][B]Dagger[/B][/COLOR]: 'with this dagger' Flaming [COLOR="Red"][B]Sword[/B][/COLOR]: 'with this sword' Flaming [COLOR="Red"][B]Axe[/B][/COLOR]: 'with this axe' etc... And in that case, you could argue that hitting with a power with Implement keyword through a dagger used as an implement fill the needed to use the power. I will say, the only thing that make me think you are right, it is the FAQ. Nothing else go against using a power from a weapon use as an implement on an implement keyword power. And what annoy me in the FAQ, it is the example of weapon they used are weapon not meant at start to be implement, that allow to be use as implement, and non have an item power that are use in conjunction with a class power. That's what they should clarify. [/QUOTE]

Verification