Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Velmont" data-source="post: 5110198" data-attributes="member: 13739">I agree with renau1g and cie about the fact that the Expertise feat have been introduce in first place to correct a math error. It need to be corrected. But I also agree that you have some flavor feet that become not interesting anymore if they don't stack with our house rule, and maybe too strong is they stack with our house rules.Why taking Draconic Spellcaster over Weapon Focus(Dagger) for a DragonbornSorcerer with the house rule? Flavor.Why taking Draconic Spellcaster over Weapon Focus(Dagger) for a DragonbornSorcerer without the house rule (Or with an extra feat)? Flavor and save a feat, because you don't need Expertise (Dagger) and Weapon Focus (Dagger) for the same effect.I think the extra feat could become an interesting option, but at the condition to wait for PHB3, as it gives more option, like Expertise Versatility (I am curious to know what the exact effect of that feat).I would probably in favor of the change finally, but I would postpone the vote after PHB3 out and look at the new option. If we have a wide array of option, an extra feat might it might just be as good as a +1.After all, we want to correct the math error without taxing all player from having to take an expertise feat among the few feat they have at low level.Some might decide to take none, others might decide to take 2 to adapt to there concept.</blockquote>