Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
Proposal: Conjuror Variant Feature
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trouvere" data-source="post: 4988627" data-attributes="member: 37250"><p>There are two advantages to Rapid Summoning that I can see - the conjurer can put an ally in place sooner, and she can avoid the problem of having to make a Concentration check if injured while casting.</p><p></p><p>At 1st level, a wizard with single digit hit points who is hit is more likely to fail to cast a summoning spell because she's been knocked unconscious than because she failed a Concentration check, while at high levels the Concentration check becomes almost a formality. If she's taking enough damage in a round that it <em>isn't</em> a formality, then she has bigger problems to worry about. I don't think Rapid Summoning provides more than a nominal advantage here.</p><p></p><p>Being able to put another body on the battle map immediately on her initiative count can be nice. It can block an enemy's charge line or provide cover, for instance. There are other ways to do that sort of thing, though. Not such a big deal, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>A rapid-summoned monster can't make a full attack in its first round. It can use a single standard action, but then has to endure whatever the enemy throws at it. Summoned monsters at low levels will generally be killed by a single hit, and at high levels they're little more than speed bumps in combat, good for blocking off lines of movement but not much else.</p><p></p><p>The variant provides an unambiguous advantage at lower levels. Of the SM I creatures, only the badger and scorpion lose out on full attacks. At SM II, it's the lemure, scorpion and squid (how often does that one come up?). But at SM III and above, many of the monsters can make multiple attacks as a full round action. They probably won't survive more than a round or two, so the balancing factor with respect to getting them in place sooner is losing out on one or more first round attack rolls, which might be 1/3 of their total.</p><p></p><p>A lot of the fun of playing a conjurer is in summoning just the right creature for your party's needs. Out of combat, the summoning time is irrelevant. In combat, it can make a big difference. Three times in just one LEW game, I've seen summoners (they were druids, but the point is unaltered) declare their intention to summon a monster only to have the situation change or even the combat end before the spell could be completed. How boring!</p><p></p><p>The variant makes conjurers "better" - not necessarily particularly more powerful, but certainly more fun to play, since they have so much more chance of using their signature tactic.</p><p></p><p>Would I choose Rapid Summoning over a raven familiar holding a wand and croaking command words, the +16 Spot check of a hawk, the blindsense of a bat, or even the +2 Fort save from a rat familiar? Maybe, maybe not.</p><p></p><p>I vote <span style="color: Lime">YES</span>.</p><p></p><p>I'd probably vote yes to all the other wizard variants on that page, with the exception of the Enchanter cohort one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trouvere, post: 4988627, member: 37250"] There are two advantages to Rapid Summoning that I can see - the conjurer can put an ally in place sooner, and she can avoid the problem of having to make a Concentration check if injured while casting. At 1st level, a wizard with single digit hit points who is hit is more likely to fail to cast a summoning spell because she's been knocked unconscious than because she failed a Concentration check, while at high levels the Concentration check becomes almost a formality. If she's taking enough damage in a round that it [I]isn't[/I] a formality, then she has bigger problems to worry about. I don't think Rapid Summoning provides more than a nominal advantage here. Being able to put another body on the battle map immediately on her initiative count can be nice. It can block an enemy's charge line or provide cover, for instance. There are other ways to do that sort of thing, though. Not such a big deal, in my opinion. A rapid-summoned monster can't make a full attack in its first round. It can use a single standard action, but then has to endure whatever the enemy throws at it. Summoned monsters at low levels will generally be killed by a single hit, and at high levels they're little more than speed bumps in combat, good for blocking off lines of movement but not much else. The variant provides an unambiguous advantage at lower levels. Of the SM I creatures, only the badger and scorpion lose out on full attacks. At SM II, it's the lemure, scorpion and squid (how often does that one come up?). But at SM III and above, many of the monsters can make multiple attacks as a full round action. They probably won't survive more than a round or two, so the balancing factor with respect to getting them in place sooner is losing out on one or more first round attack rolls, which might be 1/3 of their total. A lot of the fun of playing a conjurer is in summoning just the right creature for your party's needs. Out of combat, the summoning time is irrelevant. In combat, it can make a big difference. Three times in just one LEW game, I've seen summoners (they were druids, but the point is unaltered) declare their intention to summon a monster only to have the situation change or even the combat end before the spell could be completed. How boring! The variant makes conjurers "better" - not necessarily particularly more powerful, but certainly more fun to play, since they have so much more chance of using their signature tactic. Would I choose Rapid Summoning over a raven familiar holding a wand and croaking command words, the +16 Spot check of a hawk, the blindsense of a bat, or even the +2 Fort save from a rat familiar? Maybe, maybe not. I vote [COLOR="Lime"]YES[/COLOR]. I'd probably vote yes to all the other wizard variants on that page, with the exception of the Enchanter cohort one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living EN World
Proposal: Conjuror Variant Feature
Top