Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EvolutionKB" data-source="post: 4883306" data-attributes="member: 47833">I have two comments.&nbsp; The first is in response to Apoli's domains.&nbsp; I think skill better represents his love of the arts, not arcana.&nbsp; Skill comprises many things:&nbsp; mastery of one's mind, mastery of a certain skill(painting, singing etc), physical perfection(by exercise).&nbsp; I just think it fits better than arcana.&nbsp;Second is the avenger MC feat discussion.&nbsp; I think is it more powerful than the PHBII MC feat.&nbsp; It does have higher prereqs though, which is quite a sacrifice for those that aren't rangers(or even fighters).&nbsp; As it stands now, Rurdev(my two weapon ranger)wouldn't take the feat, even if it's &quot;better&quot;.&nbsp; I see more options presented from the fighter MC feat from MP, including pit fighter.&nbsp;Sure it gives you a sweet power every encounter, and helps the party as a whole by eliminating a significant threat more easily.&nbsp; It also gives your choice of a skill(let's face it, if you are a ranger and take this feat, you probably have perception anyway).&nbsp; But....let's not forget the fact that you can't take another MC feat(thus limiting your PP options).&nbsp; If you are a ranger, you won't take an avenger PP, and you won't take power swap feats, because they are not as good as options as the ones you already have.&nbsp; I don't think the character would outshine an avenger in the party, because you can't recharge it(I think you can oath another target if you kill your oath&nbsp; in the first round).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EvolutionKB, post: 4883306, member: 47833"] I have two comments. The first is in response to Apoli's domains. I think skill better represents his love of the arts, not arcana. Skill comprises many things: mastery of one's mind, mastery of a certain skill(painting, singing etc), physical perfection(by exercise). I just think it fits better than arcana. Second is the avenger MC feat discussion. I think is it more powerful than the PHBII MC feat. It does have higher prereqs though, which is quite a sacrifice for those that aren't rangers(or even fighters). As it stands now, Rurdev(my two weapon ranger)wouldn't take the feat, even if it's "better". I see more options presented from the fighter MC feat from MP, including pit fighter. Sure it gives you a sweet power every encounter, and helps the party as a whole by eliminating a significant threat more easily. It also gives your choice of a skill(let's face it, if you are a ranger and take this feat, you probably have perception anyway). But....let's not forget the fact that you can't take another MC feat(thus limiting your PP options). If you are a ranger, you won't take an avenger PP, and you won't take power swap feats, because they are not as good as options as the ones you already have. I don't think the character would outshine an avenger in the party, because you can't recharge it(I think you can oath another target if you kill your oath in the first round). [/QUOTE]

Verification