Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
[proposal] Genasi Feat: Mindful Manifestor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fireinthedust" data-source="post: 4753198" data-attributes="member: 51930"><p>Yeah, I've thought about the optimization levels of it somewhat.</p><p> </p><p>I think my take on it is that the physical side of things means that only warriors get the benefit of the Manifestations. 4e, unlike previous editions, doesn't have that massive avalanche of power creep for spellcasters above other classes the other editions had. The whole idea of balance, that everyone has the same power output merely with different primary stats and effect styles (strikers vs one guy, controllers vs. a bunch), really makes a big difference.</p><p> A difference for 4e is that we're not looking at the "reasons" things are the way they are. We're looking at what makes a fun game for the PCs. </p><p> </p><p>In fact, considering the Manifestations are stormSOUL and fireSOUL, it does seem that having the elemental side of things physical is not necessarily correct.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> Now taking the feats doesn't rely on a stat as much as I'd thought; specifically, Airsoul and Watersoul give movement, and Stormsoul gives me that extra d8 lightning damage. Earth and Fire are where the attacks come in, and the Elemental Tempest paragon path powers.</p><p> </p><p> I do see the counter-argument, that it would allow a character to just jump in with one stat (Int) and have all their powers come off of that; that it seems like a bid at optimization.</p><p> I just don't know that this sort of optimization is necessarily bad for the game, or that different from the classes that are already out there. A Barbarian Genasi, for example, with stormsoul and earthsoul, would be adding their primary stat (Str) to their single-target damage already. Swordmages don't need a high Str as it stands with Intelligent Blademaster.</p><p> </p><p>CORRECTING IT: would it be alright if this was a Wizard feat? Like, pre-requisite: Genasi, Wizard.</p><p> </p><p>That way a Swordmage wouldn't be able to use it AND intelligent blademaster to power their way through having only the one stat needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fireinthedust, post: 4753198, member: 51930"] Yeah, I've thought about the optimization levels of it somewhat. I think my take on it is that the physical side of things means that only warriors get the benefit of the Manifestations. 4e, unlike previous editions, doesn't have that massive avalanche of power creep for spellcasters above other classes the other editions had. The whole idea of balance, that everyone has the same power output merely with different primary stats and effect styles (strikers vs one guy, controllers vs. a bunch), really makes a big difference. A difference for 4e is that we're not looking at the "reasons" things are the way they are. We're looking at what makes a fun game for the PCs. In fact, considering the Manifestations are stormSOUL and fireSOUL, it does seem that having the elemental side of things physical is not necessarily correct. Now taking the feats doesn't rely on a stat as much as I'd thought; specifically, Airsoul and Watersoul give movement, and Stormsoul gives me that extra d8 lightning damage. Earth and Fire are where the attacks come in, and the Elemental Tempest paragon path powers. I do see the counter-argument, that it would allow a character to just jump in with one stat (Int) and have all their powers come off of that; that it seems like a bid at optimization. I just don't know that this sort of optimization is necessarily bad for the game, or that different from the classes that are already out there. A Barbarian Genasi, for example, with stormsoul and earthsoul, would be adding their primary stat (Str) to their single-target damage already. Swordmages don't need a high Str as it stands with Intelligent Blademaster. CORRECTING IT: would it be alright if this was a Wizard feat? Like, pre-requisite: Genasi, Wizard. That way a Swordmage wouldn't be able to use it AND intelligent blademaster to power their way through having only the one stat needed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
[proposal] Genasi Feat: Mindful Manifestor
Top