Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Knight Otu" data-source="post: 1567242" data-attributes="member: 192">A few comments...&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Are you sure you want the Knowledge (Nature) requirement to be 6? You could propably get there with multiclassing, and that might be your intention, but a straight sorceror would need to be 9th level. A straight bard, on the other hand, could enter at 5th level.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;You might want to make it clear in the Spells per Day description that the Learner does not receive extra spells known, as you say in the beginning of your post.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;You should likely remove animals from the Knowledge (nature) list. While they fit there, I don't think there are any animals with Su or Sp abilities. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> &nbsp;&nbsp; On the other hand, you could potentially allow Ex abilities to be learned, but I don't see that as fitting.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Due to the way the save DCs are calculated, it is easier to learn Sp abilities than Su abilities. Just as a note.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;A general thing, don't add Xth level in brackets to the ability name, especially when you also note the level at which it is gained in the text. Instead, use the brackets to note if an ability is Ex, Su or Sp in nature.&nbsp;&nbsp; Observation (Ex)&nbsp;&nbsp; Lore&nbsp;&nbsp; Lancelet (Sp)&nbsp;&nbsp; Peep (Su)&nbsp;&nbsp; Conversion (Su)&nbsp;&nbsp; Scan (Su)&nbsp;&nbsp; Resistance (Potentially Ex, otherwise natural)&nbsp;&nbsp; Continual Observation (Ex)&nbsp; With sacrifice, you mean expend the spell slot for the day?&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; A personal preference, but peep and scan seem to relay information that is normally intangible to characters.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Conversion is supposed to be DR/-, right?&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; It would be very useful to have the list of blue spells as fully written out spells, just as they would appear in the PHB.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; You'll want to remove the references to creatures not in the SRD, such as mind flayers.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;You've written the class from the perspective that all blue spell would come from monsters. I think there are a few abilities that come from classes that would make interesting blue spells.&nbsp; &nbsp; The spell levels given for blue spells are estimates, correct?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; There are a few Blue spells in the list that summon creatures.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Knight Otu, post: 1567242, member: 192"] A few comments... Are you sure you want the Knowledge (Nature) requirement to be 6? You could propably get there with multiclassing, and that might be your intention, but a straight sorceror would need to be 9th level. A straight bard, on the other hand, could enter at 5th level. You might want to make it clear in the Spells per Day description that the Learner does not receive extra spells known, as you say in the beginning of your post. You should likely remove animals from the Knowledge (nature) list. While they fit there, I don't think there are any animals with Su or Sp abilities. :p On the other hand, you could potentially allow Ex abilities to be learned, but I don't see that as fitting. Due to the way the save DCs are calculated, it is easier to learn Sp abilities than Su abilities. Just as a note. A general thing, don't add Xth level in brackets to the ability name, especially when you also note the level at which it is gained in the text. Instead, use the brackets to note if an ability is Ex, Su or Sp in nature. [b]Observation (Ex) [/b][b]Lore [/b][b]Lancelet (Sp)[/b] [b]Peep (Su) [/b][b]Conversion (Su) [/b][b]Scan (Su)[/b] [b]Resistance (Potentially Ex, otherwise natural) [/b][b]Continual Observation (Ex)[/b] With sacrifice, you mean expend the spell slot for the day? A personal preference, but peep and scan seem to relay information that is normally intangible to characters. Conversion is supposed to be DR/-, right? It would be very useful to have the list of blue spells as fully written out spells, just as they would appear in the PHB. You'll want to remove the references to creatures not in the SRD, such as mind flayers. You've written the class from the perspective that all blue spell would come from monsters. I think there are a few abilities that come from [i]classes[/i] that would make interesting blue spells. The spell levels given for blue spells are estimates, correct? There are a few Blue spells in the list that summon creatures. [/QUOTE]

Verification