Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Proposal - LEW with Pathfinder Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trouvere" data-source="post: 5154301" data-attributes="member: 37250"><p>It would feel a little derivative, no? I've gone through this before, though, probably ad several people's nauseam. The problem with LEW's Enworld is that the mapped local area is very large and very safe, as evidenced by the continued existence of old cities across it. All that nice world-building work contains the seeds of its own destruction. The local area is suitable for low level adventurers but must become either cartoonishly unrealistic or be changed beyond recognition (thereby becoming unsuitable for low level PCs) once we have a lot of higher level adventurers who need to fight terrible foes all the time. That's actually easily solvable, if high level PCs take advantage of their greater travel options, but would require mapping another area.</p><p></p><p>If you want my advice for a new living world: put a whacking great big wall across the middle of the local area. Base the adventurers in or near the wall. The low level PCs do their thing on one side of it; the higher level PCs gradually grow in confidence and venture to the other side, where the horrible things are. In either case, it's only a few days' journey to appropriate interesting challenges. Doesn't need to be a literal wall, of course.A sadly small number of people. Could perhaps be turned around if we contacted (nearly) everyone on the inactive characters list and said "hey, remember LEW? We're dying. Feel like helping to save us by playing again?" Doubtful it could be turned around if we said "Hey, feel like spending a month entirely rewriting your old PC, assuming the concept even migrates, and waiting for new approval?" Yeah, right. They could as easily make an entirely new PC. And if we're going to start afresh, with a major loss of PC continuity, well, do it in a new world.Many reasons. Why is that so hard to believe? It's a different, even though closely related, system. Even the simple conflation of Listen and Spot to Perception screws up one of my characters - Keldar, who is slightly better than most at spotting things, but constantly has fragments of poems and songs circulating in his head, so almost never succeeds at a Listen check, quite deliberately. And who is about to take Human Paragon levels. And pick up a psionic cohort.Well, great. But I don't see the relevance.</p><p></p><p>If you convert LEW to LPW, you've just reduced overall player choice, since now there's no 3.5 living world at all. If you add a new LW, then you're increasing choice. That's a better option, <em>even if</em> the result is that interest in LPW indirectly leads to the final death of LEW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trouvere, post: 5154301, member: 37250"] It would feel a little derivative, no? I've gone through this before, though, probably ad several people's nauseam. The problem with LEW's Enworld is that the mapped local area is very large and very safe, as evidenced by the continued existence of old cities across it. All that nice world-building work contains the seeds of its own destruction. The local area is suitable for low level adventurers but must become either cartoonishly unrealistic or be changed beyond recognition (thereby becoming unsuitable for low level PCs) once we have a lot of higher level adventurers who need to fight terrible foes all the time. That's actually easily solvable, if high level PCs take advantage of their greater travel options, but would require mapping another area. If you want my advice for a new living world: put a whacking great big wall across the middle of the local area. Base the adventurers in or near the wall. The low level PCs do their thing on one side of it; the higher level PCs gradually grow in confidence and venture to the other side, where the horrible things are. In either case, it's only a few days' journey to appropriate interesting challenges. Doesn't need to be a literal wall, of course.A sadly small number of people. Could perhaps be turned around if we contacted (nearly) everyone on the inactive characters list and said "hey, remember LEW? We're dying. Feel like helping to save us by playing again?" Doubtful it could be turned around if we said "Hey, feel like spending a month entirely rewriting your old PC, assuming the concept even migrates, and waiting for new approval?" Yeah, right. They could as easily make an entirely new PC. And if we're going to start afresh, with a major loss of PC continuity, well, do it in a new world.Many reasons. Why is that so hard to believe? It's a different, even though closely related, system. Even the simple conflation of Listen and Spot to Perception screws up one of my characters - Keldar, who is slightly better than most at spotting things, but constantly has fragments of poems and songs circulating in his head, so almost never succeeds at a Listen check, quite deliberately. And who is about to take Human Paragon levels. And pick up a psionic cohort.Well, great. But I don't see the relevance. If you convert LEW to LPW, you've just reduced overall player choice, since now there's no 3.5 living world at all. If you add a new LW, then you're increasing choice. That's a better option, [I]even if[/I] the result is that interest in LPW indirectly leads to the final death of LEW. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Proposal - LEW with Pathfinder Rules
Top