Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: Minotaur - MM, (Dragon,) PH3 - which one(s) allow for L4W
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ryryguy" data-source="post: 5103545" data-attributes="member: 64945"><p>Well, it seems like the judges have made up their minds already, but I'll throw in my two cents.</p><p></p><p>The "monster as PC" rules from the original MM have always had the caveat that they were intended primarily for DMs to make NPCs, and that later published versions intended for PC use would likely be different. So while it's true that when the later published version for PCs do arrive, they aren't "errata" per se. But the earlier rules were already marked as being temporary, so they should be retired, and replaced by the later, PC-focused rules.</p><p></p><p>I actually don't much like the idea of grandfathering in the older versions for existing PCs, either - if this affected a PC in my home game, I'd push him to change to the new rules. But I can certainly see why a player would want to keep the original version, and I woul give way if the player felt really strongly about it. So same thing here in L4W - keep the old version if you must.</p><p></p><p>I honestly do not see the point of keeping the old rules as a viable choice for new PCs. Why exactly is that important to do? I'd rather just have one set of rules - the ones designed specifically for PC's. Saying that the new version of a race is "crap" is a subjective judgement. And if you do feel that way, then pick another race - there are plenty to choose from. There's no guarantee that every one has to suit everybody's tastes.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying this because of any particular feeling about any particular version of minotaurs (or bugbears). I feel this way about any of the MM "races" which later get a PC version write up. It's a bad precedent to keep multiple versions alive. (And though folks now seem to be saying that if they keep the old version they won't use any feats that come with the new version, how long will it be before someone proposes opening those up?)</p><p></p><p>Let me ask this, if they release a PC version of a MM race where no one actually had a PC using the MM version, would there be any reason to keep the MM race on the allowed list?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ryryguy, post: 5103545, member: 64945"] Well, it seems like the judges have made up their minds already, but I'll throw in my two cents. The "monster as PC" rules from the original MM have always had the caveat that they were intended primarily for DMs to make NPCs, and that later published versions intended for PC use would likely be different. So while it's true that when the later published version for PCs do arrive, they aren't "errata" per se. But the earlier rules were already marked as being temporary, so they should be retired, and replaced by the later, PC-focused rules. I actually don't much like the idea of grandfathering in the older versions for existing PCs, either - if this affected a PC in my home game, I'd push him to change to the new rules. But I can certainly see why a player would want to keep the original version, and I woul give way if the player felt really strongly about it. So same thing here in L4W - keep the old version if you must. I honestly do not see the point of keeping the old rules as a viable choice for new PCs. Why exactly is that important to do? I'd rather just have one set of rules - the ones designed specifically for PC's. Saying that the new version of a race is "crap" is a subjective judgement. And if you do feel that way, then pick another race - there are plenty to choose from. There's no guarantee that every one has to suit everybody's tastes. I'm not saying this because of any particular feeling about any particular version of minotaurs (or bugbears). I feel this way about any of the MM "races" which later get a PC version write up. It's a bad precedent to keep multiple versions alive. (And though folks now seem to be saying that if they keep the old version they won't use any feats that come with the new version, how long will it be before someone proposes opening those up?) Let me ask this, if they release a PC version of a MM race where no one actually had a PC using the MM version, would there be any reason to keep the MM race on the allowed list? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: Minotaur - MM, (Dragon,) PH3 - which one(s) allow for L4W
Top