Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: Minotaur - MM, (Dragon,) PH3 - which one(s) allow for L4W
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elecgraystone" data-source="post: 5113957" data-attributes="member: 74232"><p>Just pointing out that WOTC doesn't say a thing about MM races being any kind of issue in their online products. They treat them 100% the same way as other book races. If there is a warning in the MM it should be in everything that has that race. The same thing applies to the base MM races matching the other products, minotaurs included. It's the same issue from another point of view.</p><p> </p><p>#1 a player having core + errata and not knowing there is a change in the MM races and</p><p> </p><p>#2 a player having the players hand book + CB and not knowing there is a warning on the MM races.</p><p> </p><p>Both are WOTC not being consistent. I think it shouldn't matter how the player makes up a character, it should match up. It also shows that WOTC weren't too serious about that warning.</p><p> </p><p>renau1g, there are still people on both sides of this issue and it seems that'd be in everyone's best interest to hash it out since this can come up for another vote in less than a month and even if it doesn't it may come up again with other races like the bugbear.</p><p> </p><p>However if everyone has gotten to the 'agree to disagree' stage, there isn't any reason to beat a dead horse. If we are then I'll agree to drop it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elecgraystone, post: 5113957, member: 74232"] Just pointing out that WOTC doesn't say a thing about MM races being any kind of issue in their online products. They treat them 100% the same way as other book races. If there is a warning in the MM it should be in everything that has that race. The same thing applies to the base MM races matching the other products, minotaurs included. It's the same issue from another point of view. #1 a player having core + errata and not knowing there is a change in the MM races and #2 a player having the players hand book + CB and not knowing there is a warning on the MM races. Both are WOTC not being consistent. I think it shouldn't matter how the player makes up a character, it should match up. It also shows that WOTC weren't too serious about that warning. renau1g, there are still people on both sides of this issue and it seems that'd be in everyone's best interest to hash it out since this can come up for another vote in less than a month and even if it doesn't it may come up again with other races like the bugbear. However if everyone has gotten to the 'agree to disagree' stage, there isn't any reason to beat a dead horse. If we are then I'll agree to drop it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: Minotaur - MM, (Dragon,) PH3 - which one(s) allow for L4W
Top