Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: More open character judging
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JoeNotCharles" data-source="post: 4821152" data-attributes="member: 79945"><p>So, I see N3rday's been added as a character judge. Welcome, N3rday! But I'm not sure adding more char-only judges is going to help with the backlog right now, since the rules say each character needs to be judged by at least one full judge. Most of the characters in the queue have been reviewed by me and are waiting for a full judge, which doesn't leave much for N3rday to do.</p><p></p><p>The point of needing two judges for each character is that sometimes, one judge will miss something or get a rule wrong, so it's always good to have a double-check - don't want to change that. And the point of requiring a full judge is that judges have been around for a while and we know that they have a good handle on the rules, while some character judges just show up out of the blue and volunteer to help clear out the queue, so we don't necessarily know whether they're skilled or are trustworthy. (I'm amazed that I haven't seen any trolls here, but we have to plan for it in case one shows up...)</p><p></p><p>However, this means that even if we expand the number of character judges, we still have a lot of characters bottlenecked until a full judge can look at them, and the full judges are very busy.</p><p></p><p>I'd like to propose a change to the rule: instead of having character judges and full judges, let's have character judges and probationary character judges. Every full judge is automatically a full character judge, but omebody who signs up to be a character judge is "on probation" for a certain number of characters - lets say 10. At least one approval for each character needs to be from a full character judge. Once they judge 10 new characters without consistently screwing things up, a probationary character judge graduates and is able to act as a full character judge.</p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure Lord Sessadore and I have done enough to graduate from probation immediately, which would let N3rday start doing the second review on all the characters that are sitting there with "1 approval from JoeNotCharles". Not sure about Ata - he mentioned in the discussion thread that he hadn't done very much of it. The number 10 is up for discussion as well, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JoeNotCharles, post: 4821152, member: 79945"] So, I see N3rday's been added as a character judge. Welcome, N3rday! But I'm not sure adding more char-only judges is going to help with the backlog right now, since the rules say each character needs to be judged by at least one full judge. Most of the characters in the queue have been reviewed by me and are waiting for a full judge, which doesn't leave much for N3rday to do. The point of needing two judges for each character is that sometimes, one judge will miss something or get a rule wrong, so it's always good to have a double-check - don't want to change that. And the point of requiring a full judge is that judges have been around for a while and we know that they have a good handle on the rules, while some character judges just show up out of the blue and volunteer to help clear out the queue, so we don't necessarily know whether they're skilled or are trustworthy. (I'm amazed that I haven't seen any trolls here, but we have to plan for it in case one shows up...) However, this means that even if we expand the number of character judges, we still have a lot of characters bottlenecked until a full judge can look at them, and the full judges are very busy. I'd like to propose a change to the rule: instead of having character judges and full judges, let's have character judges and probationary character judges. Every full judge is automatically a full character judge, but omebody who signs up to be a character judge is "on probation" for a certain number of characters - lets say 10. At least one approval for each character needs to be from a full character judge. Once they judge 10 new characters without consistently screwing things up, a probationary character judge graduates and is able to act as a full character judge. I'm pretty sure Lord Sessadore and I have done enough to graduate from probation immediately, which would let N3rday start doing the second review on all the characters that are sitting there with "1 approval from JoeNotCharles". Not sure about Ata - he mentioned in the discussion thread that he hadn't done very much of it. The number 10 is up for discussion as well, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: More open character judging
Top