Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: PH2 and SORCERER
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwoHeadsBarking" data-source="post: 4812498" data-attributes="member: 82251"><p>I think the PHB2 backgrounds are a little more powerful, actually. Not because of the numbers, but because of the flexibility. The Kingdom of Jade bonus of +1 Insight, +2 social Bluff measures very well against a PHB2 +2 Bluff, but what if you don't care about Bluff? What if you wanted Stealth, or Perception? Then clearly the PHB2 is the way to go, <em>especially</em> since instead of getting +2 to a skill you can add it to your class list. This is huge. I'd love to get Stealth or Perception as class skills, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I'm less than impressed with the option to learn another language, though.</p><p></p><p>Regardless, I'm not against the PHB2 backgrounds because of balance. I'm against them because, as you said, they're generic. Also, right now any Dauntonian has a little something in common with all Dauntonians. If we replaced our current backgrounds with choose-your-own PHB2 ones, that's not going to remain the case.</p><p></p><p>That being said, I like the idea of characters from non-defined Far Lands having +2 to an appropriate skill (maybe not requiring a proposal, either). I just don't think any character from a currently defined area should have a PHB2-esque background, and I worry that if we give Far-Landers a choice of where they get their +2, we're going to see a disproportionately large amount of them. But perhaps that's not a bad thing.</p><p></p><p>Edit: I take back that last part about the worrying. I now doubt it would be anything resembling a problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwoHeadsBarking, post: 4812498, member: 82251"] I think the PHB2 backgrounds are a little more powerful, actually. Not because of the numbers, but because of the flexibility. The Kingdom of Jade bonus of +1 Insight, +2 social Bluff measures very well against a PHB2 +2 Bluff, but what if you don't care about Bluff? What if you wanted Stealth, or Perception? Then clearly the PHB2 is the way to go, [I]especially[/I] since instead of getting +2 to a skill you can add it to your class list. This is huge. I'd love to get Stealth or Perception as class skills, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I'm less than impressed with the option to learn another language, though. Regardless, I'm not against the PHB2 backgrounds because of balance. I'm against them because, as you said, they're generic. Also, right now any Dauntonian has a little something in common with all Dauntonians. If we replaced our current backgrounds with choose-your-own PHB2 ones, that's not going to remain the case. That being said, I like the idea of characters from non-defined Far Lands having +2 to an appropriate skill (maybe not requiring a proposal, either). I just don't think any character from a currently defined area should have a PHB2-esque background, and I worry that if we give Far-Landers a choice of where they get their +2, we're going to see a disproportionately large amount of them. But perhaps that's not a bad thing. Edit: I take back that last part about the worrying. I now doubt it would be anything resembling a problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
Proposal: PH2 and SORCERER
Top