Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[PROPOSAL] The non-negative min-maxer: "Tweaker"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ottergame" data-source="post: 1436742" data-attributes="member: 9326"><p>Here's what I propose. </p><p></p><p>Munchkin applies to the most disruptive of gamers, taking power gaming and min/maxing to the hilt, creating characters who horde the spotlight and are good at everything possible, stuffing the other gamers into irrelevance (or closest thing to it). (If playing a cleric, they will make sure they can fight as well as the fighter, do as much magic damage as the wizard, will be as hard to hit as the monk, and will be as hard to find as the rogue, in fact, the only area which they will likely be weak in is in the actual healing of their group mates.)</p><p></p><p>Power gamer is someone who is maxed out in some combat related way, to the point of disrupting the play and actions of other gamers, weither intentional or not. They dislike and try to eliminate all flaws and weaknesses. (If they play a fighter, they will do everything to bump up their poor saves and make sure they have immunties to a lot of magic, and they make sure to have every benefical feat and item that lets them do more damage.) They do this regardless (or disregarding) of character background, if they bothered to think of any.</p><p></p><p>Min/maxer is someone who focuses their character heavily into being good at one thing, and who generally doesn't disrupt another gamers play unless they are competiting to be the best in an identical area. They will settle for weaknesses in their character as long as it doesn't affect their goal. (If they play a wizard, they will settle for a few magic items to boost up their AC, they generally won't spend the first few rounds in every combat buffing themselves up) They make some attempt to link their background to their abilities.</p><p></p><p>A tweaker is a role playing min/maxer, who focus their characters abilites to max out their potential in areas that they feel devolps their character. They can live with weaknesses, but generally try to plug up and huge holes in defenses. Their play style may or may not disrupt another player, but this should be mostly due to how they play, not how powerful their characters may be. (If playing a bard, they might max out their bardic knowledge checks and funnel a lot of their abilities into skill checks, but will settle for simple weapons and armor, taking a few magical items to bump up their AC if it's to low.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ottergame, post: 1436742, member: 9326"] Here's what I propose. Munchkin applies to the most disruptive of gamers, taking power gaming and min/maxing to the hilt, creating characters who horde the spotlight and are good at everything possible, stuffing the other gamers into irrelevance (or closest thing to it). (If playing a cleric, they will make sure they can fight as well as the fighter, do as much magic damage as the wizard, will be as hard to hit as the monk, and will be as hard to find as the rogue, in fact, the only area which they will likely be weak in is in the actual healing of their group mates.) Power gamer is someone who is maxed out in some combat related way, to the point of disrupting the play and actions of other gamers, weither intentional or not. They dislike and try to eliminate all flaws and weaknesses. (If they play a fighter, they will do everything to bump up their poor saves and make sure they have immunties to a lot of magic, and they make sure to have every benefical feat and item that lets them do more damage.) They do this regardless (or disregarding) of character background, if they bothered to think of any. Min/maxer is someone who focuses their character heavily into being good at one thing, and who generally doesn't disrupt another gamers play unless they are competiting to be the best in an identical area. They will settle for weaknesses in their character as long as it doesn't affect their goal. (If they play a wizard, they will settle for a few magic items to boost up their AC, they generally won't spend the first few rounds in every combat buffing themselves up) They make some attempt to link their background to their abilities. A tweaker is a role playing min/maxer, who focus their characters abilites to max out their potential in areas that they feel devolps their character. They can live with weaknesses, but generally try to plug up and huge holes in defenses. Their play style may or may not disrupt another player, but this should be mostly due to how they play, not how powerful their characters may be. (If playing a bard, they might max out their bardic knowledge checks and funnel a lot of their abilities into skill checks, but will settle for simple weapons and armor, taking a few magical items to bump up their AC if it's to low.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[PROPOSAL] The non-negative min-maxer: "Tweaker"
Top