Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living Pathfinder [closed]
Proposal: Wayangs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Qik" data-source="post: 5894124" data-attributes="member: 6673727"><p>I also agree that sticking to RAW is the preferential way to go; I had only suggested it in case others were comfortable with making the minor change, since personally, I would have hated to have the Wayangs rejected on the basis of a +2 modifier to one skill (which doesn't seem like it will be the case).</p><p></p><p>Determining a formula for accepting races from the ARG sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure how one would go about determining that without running the risk of unintended inclusions or omissions. Personally, I would feel much more comfortable continuing our trend of accepting things based on proposals. It's a lot more work, yes, but I feel it's the most sure-fire way to avoid unintended consequences. That's just my two cents.</p><p></p><p>As I said earlier, putting off this proposal would in my view net little except for stalling. I can't really see Paizo making any changes that would have an impact on our decision: given the relatively close proximity of the release of the Dragon Empires to the ARG, I would imagine the casting of Wayangs will be relatively consistent. Putting off this proposal whilst deciding what to do about allowing new races in general, on the other hand, strikes me as more sensible, although again, I'm not entirely convinced that we'll be able to come up with an overall consensus on factors which dictate the inclusion or exclusion of races which would enable us to much more smoothly deal with the incoming new races from the ARG. I could, of course, be entirely wrong on that, though. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Qik, post: 5894124, member: 6673727"] I also agree that sticking to RAW is the preferential way to go; I had only suggested it in case others were comfortable with making the minor change, since personally, I would have hated to have the Wayangs rejected on the basis of a +2 modifier to one skill (which doesn't seem like it will be the case). Determining a formula for accepting races from the ARG sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure how one would go about determining that without running the risk of unintended inclusions or omissions. Personally, I would feel much more comfortable continuing our trend of accepting things based on proposals. It's a lot more work, yes, but I feel it's the most sure-fire way to avoid unintended consequences. That's just my two cents. As I said earlier, putting off this proposal would in my view net little except for stalling. I can't really see Paizo making any changes that would have an impact on our decision: given the relatively close proximity of the release of the Dragon Empires to the ARG, I would imagine the casting of Wayangs will be relatively consistent. Putting off this proposal whilst deciding what to do about allowing new races in general, on the other hand, strikes me as more sensible, although again, I'm not entirely convinced that we'll be able to come up with an overall consensus on factors which dictate the inclusion or exclusion of races which would enable us to much more smoothly deal with the incoming new races from the ARG. I could, of course, be entirely wrong on that, though. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living Pathfinder [closed]
Proposal: Wayangs
Top