Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4451478" data-attributes="member: 710">I am not sure that proposing a major overhaul to the multi-classing/spell-casting system will work at all. I might be wrong, but I think that's a little beyond the scope of a play-test. But if it works, the best thing you can do is: Do things that don't invalidate existing stat-blocks. (Though changing HD can do this already). So maybe the multi-class caster should still have the possibility to have all the spells prepared he has in his stat-block. I suppose it's okay if it is not the optimum combination of spells (in most proposals, the highest level of available spells for each class would go up).---I find it interesting how the arrival of 4E and the announcement of Pathfinder motivates people to _really_ look into the problematic issues and not just post stuff intended as a mere house-rule, but actually consider ways to publish them. You guys should have been active 4-6 years ago (perhaps before 3.5 was in the works!)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4451478, member: 710"] I am not sure that proposing a major overhaul to the multi-classing/spell-casting system will work at all. I might be wrong, but I think that's a little beyond the scope of a play-test. But if it works, the best thing you can do is: Do things that don't invalidate existing stat-blocks. (Though changing HD can do this already). So maybe the multi-class caster should still have the possibility to have all the spells prepared he has in his stat-block. I suppose it's okay if it is not the optimum combination of spells (in most proposals, the highest level of available spells for each class would go up). --- I find it interesting how the arrival of 4E and the announcement of Pathfinder motivates people to _really_ look into the problematic issues and not just post stuff intended as a mere house-rule, but actually consider ways to publish them. You guys should have been active 4-6 years ago (perhaps before 3.5 was in the works!) [/QUOTE]

Verification