Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Proposed rule for number of character-class-equivalent NPCs in a D&D world
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 7156418" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>You seem to be saying that you have concerns about assuming some %age of a population are tier 3 or tier 4 cc-equiv. Is that right?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Am I right to understand that you don't value most of the <strong>DMG</strong> and in particular <strong>Chapter 4</strong>, because it adds rules for NPCs?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I valued your comment about using HD to estimate their tier equivalent. <strong>Knights</strong> are <strong>8HD</strong> for instance so fit into <strong>tier 2</strong>. </p><p></p><p><em><strong>Damara </strong>had a population of about 1.3m in the 14th Century so given 1300 tier 2 we may (but do not have to) say that one-quarter of those are knights in service. About 300 knights. In war time that swells to a thousand. That helps when it comes to portraying the war with Zhengi, or for my campaign, the civil war. I can describe a large battle for the players in a rich way that will be consistent with other, related portrayals. I can quickly guess that each side of my civil war can field around 500 Knights supported by perhaps 5000 Guards and Scouts. I can talk about there being a few hundred mercenaries drawn to the war from neighbouring kingdoms.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm very curious about it, and very open-minded. What problems are you concerned about that arise when we put numbers on their frequency?</p><p></p><p></p><p>High-handed dismissal from a position lacking substance is honestly objectionable. Therefore I object. It is an appeal to self-appointed authority rather than a discussion: "<em>Trust me, I'm right.</em>" Well, maybe you don't see any problem with that approach?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 7156418, member: 71699"] You seem to be saying that you have concerns about assuming some %age of a population are tier 3 or tier 4 cc-equiv. Is that right? Am I right to understand that you don't value most of the [B]DMG[/B] and in particular [B]Chapter 4[/B], because it adds rules for NPCs? I valued your comment about using HD to estimate their tier equivalent. [B]Knights[/B] are [B]8HD[/B] for instance so fit into [B]tier 2[/B]. [I][B]Damara [/B]had a population of about 1.3m in the 14th Century so given 1300 tier 2 we may (but do not have to) say that one-quarter of those are knights in service. About 300 knights. In war time that swells to a thousand. That helps when it comes to portraying the war with Zhengi, or for my campaign, the civil war. I can describe a large battle for the players in a rich way that will be consistent with other, related portrayals. I can quickly guess that each side of my civil war can field around 500 Knights supported by perhaps 5000 Guards and Scouts. I can talk about there being a few hundred mercenaries drawn to the war from neighbouring kingdoms.[/I] I'm very curious about it, and very open-minded. What problems are you concerned about that arise when we put numbers on their frequency? High-handed dismissal from a position lacking substance is honestly objectionable. Therefore I object. It is an appeal to self-appointed authority rather than a discussion: "[I]Trust me, I'm right.[/I]" Well, maybe you don't see any problem with that approach? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Proposed rule for number of character-class-equivalent NPCs in a D&D world
Top