Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Protection from Chaos Part XI: The D&D Next Online Playtest Agreement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 5929893" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>I have two questions about that analysis.</p><p> </p><p>1) Where he talks about the lack of signatures and identification rendering it unenforceable. How does that compare to a common EULA, which also has no signatures or identification?</p><p> </p><p>2) I also noticed the bit about "designated forums" for feedback. This seemed contradicted to me by the clause at the end which said you were welcome to discuss your thoughts publicly: <em>"Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may publicly discuss your thoughts regarding the D&D Next Playtest Materials and your playtesting experience."</em> How do those two stack up? Regarding their intentions, they've certainly indicated that they're happy to see blog posts and threads at places like EN World, so I wonder if this is a case of language and intent not matching.</p><p> </p><p>3) Regarding the online playtesting. My understanding at present is that the restriction is in place because it entails reproducing the content of - at the very least - the adventure, and they don't want people who haven't essentially agreed not to republish (prepublish?) it being able to see it (the non-effectiveness of that notwithstanding - that's what the intention is). However, they are reviewing that at present.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 5929893, member: 1"] I have two questions about that analysis. 1) Where he talks about the lack of signatures and identification rendering it unenforceable. How does that compare to a common EULA, which also has no signatures or identification? 2) I also noticed the bit about "designated forums" for feedback. This seemed contradicted to me by the clause at the end which said you were welcome to discuss your thoughts publicly: [I]"Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may publicly discuss your thoughts regarding the D&D Next Playtest Materials and your playtesting experience."[/I] How do those two stack up? Regarding their intentions, they've certainly indicated that they're happy to see blog posts and threads at places like EN World, so I wonder if this is a case of language and intent not matching. 3) Regarding the online playtesting. My understanding at present is that the restriction is in place because it entails reproducing the content of - at the very least - the adventure, and they don't want people who haven't essentially agreed not to republish (prepublish?) it being able to see it (the non-effectiveness of that notwithstanding - that's what the intention is). However, they are reviewing that at present. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Protection from Chaos Part XI: The D&D Next Online Playtest Agreement
Top