Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BOZ" data-source="post: 4343267" data-attributes="member: 1241">I have added this section to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahuagin" target="_blank">sahuagin</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moradin" target="_blank">Moradin</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corellon_Larethian" target="_blank">Corellon</a>. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />OK cool!  is it up yet, so's I can have a look at it?  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />yes; one thing I'm hoping is that by putting this pub. history up front in each article, people who are interested in improving the article will know exactly where to look to pull more info or add citations.Naw, there are far fewer D&D articles on Wikipedia than there are old monsters to convert.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  We just need more people working on improving them.  The thing is, a lot of people have given up working on the articles, because who wants to waste your time on something that has a good chance at being eliminated altogether?The primary person who was nominating D&D articles slowed down considerably at the deletions, and in fact was focusing much more on adding tags for improvement to them.  unfortunately, because he has done so many, you have a whole bunch of articles where you have to scroll down just to read at all, and no one's really making an effort to work on them because there are just so many. i don't foresee a big push to fix it, but you never know!  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification