Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Provoking multiple AoOs...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mordane76" data-source="post: 1965647" data-attributes="member: 7172"><p>Actually, up until this point, I wouldn't have allowed a trip, sunder, or disarm as part of iterative attacks; I would have told a player that since it is a standard action to do so (as listed on the table) that it can't be part of a full attack. I went and re-read the SRD on these actions - it says "as a melee attack," whereas I thought they were 'standard actions,' as they are listed on the table.</p><p></p><p>Given this reading, I would agree that one should trigger an AoO on each iterative attack with the bow. But nowhere in the tables or the text does it state this directly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't get to PLAY D&D at all - I haven't actually played as a player in a real game for years, and I haven't had the pleasure of being in a D&D PbP that's lasted more than a few pages. I have no exploit planned; it's just how I read the tables. The table versus the text leaves certain ambiguities; reading the table, I wouldn't allow someone to mix and match sunder, trip, and disarm into a full attack as they are separate standard actions in the table. Reading the text, I would, and thus each would trigger the AoO. And, just because you find Combat Reflexes to be rare doesn't mean I do - Combat Reflexes makes players think long and hard about how they move and what they do, and I find it astounding that more people don't take it given the opportunity for extra attacks it provides.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mordane76, post: 1965647, member: 7172"] Actually, up until this point, I wouldn't have allowed a trip, sunder, or disarm as part of iterative attacks; I would have told a player that since it is a standard action to do so (as listed on the table) that it can't be part of a full attack. I went and re-read the SRD on these actions - it says "as a melee attack," whereas I thought they were 'standard actions,' as they are listed on the table. Given this reading, I would agree that one should trigger an AoO on each iterative attack with the bow. But nowhere in the tables or the text does it state this directly. I don't get to PLAY D&D at all - I haven't actually played as a player in a real game for years, and I haven't had the pleasure of being in a D&D PbP that's lasted more than a few pages. I have no exploit planned; it's just how I read the tables. The table versus the text leaves certain ambiguities; reading the table, I wouldn't allow someone to mix and match sunder, trip, and disarm into a full attack as they are separate standard actions in the table. Reading the text, I would, and thus each would trigger the AoO. And, just because you find Combat Reflexes to be rare doesn't mean I do - Combat Reflexes makes players think long and hard about how they move and what they do, and I find it astounding that more people don't take it given the opportunity for extra attacks it provides. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Provoking multiple AoOs...
Top