Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Psionics Coming Soon To D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fuindordm" data-source="post: 7671981" data-attributes="member: 5435"><p>I can't really agree with this! There are several levers to pull when designing a "special powers" subsystem, and all you need to do is make sure that the different subsystems appeal to different styles of play.</p><p></p><p>So far, in the core rules, we don't have much variation on the spell slot theme:</p><p></p><p>Divine: all spells known, prepare spells, spell list has defensive slant</p><p>Wizard: all spells potentially known, prepare spells, spell list has offensive slant</p><p>Sorcerer: few spells known, spell list has offensive slant, can boost spells and spell slots are fungible</p><p>Bard: moderate spells known, spell list has defensive slant</p><p></p><p>But all of these share the same slot progression, the same hard cap on spells > 6th level, and the same dependence on V/S/M components. All three can be dialed up or down for a different game play experience.</p><p></p><p>For example, someone might think the most important feature of a psionics system is that even a low-level psionic can go nova with their highest-level powers. Then we might blow the cap on 6th level and higher powers, and introduce higher-level powers more quickly. What is the fair cost of this increase in power? We can dial down the number of spell slots (or equivalent resource) drastically. Then there is the lack of components--another clear advantage that has to be balanced. So one possible framework for psionics on the spell slot model becomes:</p><p></p><p>Few powers known, powers list has defensive slant, no cap on use of high-level powers, slow slot progression compared to arcane/divine classes, no V/S/M components, powers can be boosted, slots are fungible. </p><p></p><p>So on the face of it it's similar to the sorcerer (with psi points, metapsionics, fungible slots) but it also has some unique features that drastically change the experience of the class (very different spell list, can burn points/slots to fuel multiple high-level powers if needed, no components for any spell).</p><p></p><p>Returning to your point, is this a power system that is so much better than the standard classes that players will flock to it? I don't think so. And many other combinations are possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fuindordm, post: 7671981, member: 5435"] I can't really agree with this! There are several levers to pull when designing a "special powers" subsystem, and all you need to do is make sure that the different subsystems appeal to different styles of play. So far, in the core rules, we don't have much variation on the spell slot theme: Divine: all spells known, prepare spells, spell list has defensive slant Wizard: all spells potentially known, prepare spells, spell list has offensive slant Sorcerer: few spells known, spell list has offensive slant, can boost spells and spell slots are fungible Bard: moderate spells known, spell list has defensive slant But all of these share the same slot progression, the same hard cap on spells > 6th level, and the same dependence on V/S/M components. All three can be dialed up or down for a different game play experience. For example, someone might think the most important feature of a psionics system is that even a low-level psionic can go nova with their highest-level powers. Then we might blow the cap on 6th level and higher powers, and introduce higher-level powers more quickly. What is the fair cost of this increase in power? We can dial down the number of spell slots (or equivalent resource) drastically. Then there is the lack of components--another clear advantage that has to be balanced. So one possible framework for psionics on the spell slot model becomes: Few powers known, powers list has defensive slant, no cap on use of high-level powers, slow slot progression compared to arcane/divine classes, no V/S/M components, powers can be boosted, slots are fungible. So on the face of it it's similar to the sorcerer (with psi points, metapsionics, fungible slots) but it also has some unique features that drastically change the experience of the class (very different spell list, can burn points/slots to fuel multiple high-level powers if needed, no components for any spell). Returning to your point, is this a power system that is so much better than the standard classes that players will flock to it? I don't think so. And many other combinations are possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Psionics Coming Soon To D&D?
Top