Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Psionics - core or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 5839894" data-attributes="member: 17106"><p>My impression is that the mentality has been shifted from "everything is core" to "almost nothing is core" (the toolbox idea). Given that, psionics has enough of a presence in D&D that it absolutely deserves to be presented with the initial playtest. This allows the skeptics to get comfortable with it, and the rules to be properly playtested in context. It won't suit everyone, but then again, neither will the classic magic system or any number of other rules.</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I think the absolute opposite is true. Every different type of supernatural power should have completely different mechanical underpinnings. Otherwise, there is (as others have said) no real reason to call out these different types of powers.</p><p></p><p>Psionics ought to be a highly intuitive skill/feat/ability score based system with no slots, points, powers, or any other extraneous mechanics. It should feel completely natural, and thus completely different from the classic but hackneyed Vancian magic system.</p><p></p><p>I think they actually have more of a presence than most people realize.</p><p></p><p>For example one of the things 4e got right (hey, it happens) was putting monks under the psionic envelope. The whole eastern 'qi'/'ki' concept has something of a science-y feel to it and doesn't mesh with traditional D&D flavor, but is absolutely a valid fantasy trope and feels very 'psionic' to me. Similarly, I wrote a psionic class based on the idea of a yogi.</p><p></p><p>I think the seer is also more appropriate as a psionic archetype than a divine magic one (or, at least, both are independently valid).</p><p></p><p>Even given that it does have a bit of a sci-fi feel, so do D&D's Lovecraftian elements (including psionic monsters like illithids), or its Frankenstein-like flesh golems, or its steampunk elements (particularly Eberron). I certainly think psychic powers are more appropriate for fantasy then, say, warforged, or heroes with spiked hair and six packs or hourglass bodies. D&D accepts a wide variety of influences, and there's not a clear line between sci-fi and fantasy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 5839894, member: 17106"] My impression is that the mentality has been shifted from "everything is core" to "almost nothing is core" (the toolbox idea). Given that, psionics has enough of a presence in D&D that it absolutely deserves to be presented with the initial playtest. This allows the skeptics to get comfortable with it, and the rules to be properly playtested in context. It won't suit everyone, but then again, neither will the classic magic system or any number of other rules. Frankly, I think the absolute opposite is true. Every different type of supernatural power should have completely different mechanical underpinnings. Otherwise, there is (as others have said) no real reason to call out these different types of powers. Psionics ought to be a highly intuitive skill/feat/ability score based system with no slots, points, powers, or any other extraneous mechanics. It should feel completely natural, and thus completely different from the classic but hackneyed Vancian magic system. I think they actually have more of a presence than most people realize. For example one of the things 4e got right (hey, it happens) was putting monks under the psionic envelope. The whole eastern 'qi'/'ki' concept has something of a science-y feel to it and doesn't mesh with traditional D&D flavor, but is absolutely a valid fantasy trope and feels very 'psionic' to me. Similarly, I wrote a psionic class based on the idea of a yogi. I think the seer is also more appropriate as a psionic archetype than a divine magic one (or, at least, both are independently valid). Even given that it does have a bit of a sci-fi feel, so do D&D's Lovecraftian elements (including psionic monsters like illithids), or its Frankenstein-like flesh golems, or its steampunk elements (particularly Eberron). I certainly think psychic powers are more appropriate for fantasy then, say, warforged, or heroes with spiked hair and six packs or hourglass bodies. D&D accepts a wide variety of influences, and there's not a clear line between sci-fi and fantasy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Psionics - core or not?
Top