Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7675627" data-attributes="member: 1465">Same for me.I don't mind that much to have stronger fluff as long as it can be just treated as an example. For instance, I have NEVER played a game of D&D where the Wizard Schools were real organizations (much less actual premises), but instead just 'schools of thought' like philosophers who may be grouped (by others) theoretically even if they don't have a personal relationship or even lived at the same time. Druid circles, Bard colleges etc. they all work as real things or loose concepts, whatever you want.Still, the connection of psionics to the Far Realms feels too much artificial, unneeded and straight inappropriate (because Far Realm is madness, and psionic is clarity i.e. the opposite) to me. And I don't think we need another 'every power needs a source' rush like in previous edition. Psionics to me feels very much from within (like Sorcery) so it doesn't need an external source or connection to 'someone/thing is granting me these powers'.</blockquote>