Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Psionics in Tasha
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8093448" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>You know why, don't you?</p><p></p><p>Cause none of you so-called "psionics fans" could decide on how exactly psionics was supposed to be!</p><p></p><p>It's the same thing as all the "warlord fans"... we had 577 different threads about psionics and warlords and there was never a single consensus of what had to be or had to not be there. Hell... even something as simple as components had the psionics fans going back and forth for dozens of pages on whether they were okay or not, or whether some types were okay or not, and if they weren't okay, what the balancing factor had to be to not overpower psionics compared to spellcasting? None of you could decide... and all of you were immobile on compromise.</p><p></p><p>And this is why the surveys determined that anything other than what we are getting-- psionics as merely another "Power Source" of spellcasting-- was not going to fly. Cause no one had any cohesive idea of what it should be instead. And this is why we've been saying all along "be careful what you wish for" and "make up something for yourself" because it's the only way each of you was going to get a system you would enjoy for yourself.</p><p></p><p>P.S... all you seven Warlords fans... we have seen literally over a dozen attempts here on EN World to "create a Warlord class"... and every single one has died out before it was finished because people participating could never come to consensus or they just lost their taste for it. So please, for the love of all that is holy... do not keep hoping WotC is going to make you one. Cause you're going to be disappointed. All of you. If you can't even make your own Warlord that the folks here on EN World are happy with... do you really think WotC is going to be able to do it once they open up their surveys to all the other players out there who <em>don't</em> have these exceedingly narrow and idiosyncratic beliefs about what a Warlord is?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8093448, member: 7006"] You know why, don't you? Cause none of you so-called "psionics fans" could decide on how exactly psionics was supposed to be! It's the same thing as all the "warlord fans"... we had 577 different threads about psionics and warlords and there was never a single consensus of what had to be or had to not be there. Hell... even something as simple as components had the psionics fans going back and forth for dozens of pages on whether they were okay or not, or whether some types were okay or not, and if they weren't okay, what the balancing factor had to be to not overpower psionics compared to spellcasting? None of you could decide... and all of you were immobile on compromise. And this is why the surveys determined that anything other than what we are getting-- psionics as merely another "Power Source" of spellcasting-- was not going to fly. Cause no one had any cohesive idea of what it should be instead. And this is why we've been saying all along "be careful what you wish for" and "make up something for yourself" because it's the only way each of you was going to get a system you would enjoy for yourself. P.S... all you seven Warlords fans... we have seen literally over a dozen attempts here on EN World to "create a Warlord class"... and every single one has died out before it was finished because people participating could never come to consensus or they just lost their taste for it. So please, for the love of all that is holy... do not keep hoping WotC is going to make you one. Cause you're going to be disappointed. All of you. If you can't even make your own Warlord that the folks here on EN World are happy with... do you really think WotC is going to be able to do it once they open up their surveys to all the other players out there who [I]don't[/I] have these exceedingly narrow and idiosyncratic beliefs about what a Warlord is? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Psionics in Tasha
Top
