Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 8094943" data-attributes="member: 23751">In your opinion, sure.&nbsp; In mine and many others who have been arguing our side of it, you are wrong.If this is what you have gathered, then it's no wonder you don't think we've defined it.&nbsp; You haven't understood anything at all.&nbsp; Nobody is irrationally hating this.&nbsp; It's very rational and has been explained to you many times. It's actually more irrational to fail to understand what we are saying at this point. Dude.&nbsp; I've said multiple times that psionics are an internal power(not external like Sorcerers use) of the mind that does not use components at all.&nbsp; You've had that concrete thing for the vast majority of this thread.&nbsp; I've even supplied very strong evidence that WotC views it the same way, just as has every prior edition of D&amp;D that has had psionics.&nbsp; Well, maybe not 4e.&nbsp; I don't know how 4e handled that.Tasha's spells are probably more along the lines of the psionic sorcerer subclass we saw, where WotC said that these weren't psionic subclasses, but were rather normal arcane, divine, whatever classes that drew on some psionic power to alter their abilities a bit.&nbsp; What we are seeing isn't even psionics by WotC standards.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 8094943, member: 23751"] In your opinion, sure. In mine and many others who have been arguing our side of it, you are wrong. If this is what you have gathered, then it's no wonder you don't think we've defined it. You haven't understood anything at all. Nobody is irrationally hating this. It's very rational and has been explained to you many times. It's actually more irrational to fail to understand what we are saying at this point. Dude. I've said multiple times that psionics are an internal power(not external like Sorcerers use) of the mind that does not use components at all. You've had that concrete thing for the vast majority of this thread. I've even supplied very strong evidence that WotC views it the same way, just as has every prior edition of D&D that has had psionics. Well, maybe not 4e. I don't know how 4e handled that. Tasha's spells are probably more along the lines of the psionic sorcerer subclass we saw, where WotC said that these weren't psionic subclasses, but were rather normal arcane, divine, whatever classes that drew on some psionic power to alter their abilities a bit. What we are seeing isn't even psionics by WotC standards. [/QUOTE]

Verification