Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Psionics: What Do You Want?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheWriterFantastic™" data-source="post: 9672645" data-attributes="member: 88534"><p>I don't think the current version is even near perfect, but I think it's a good start - 1E psionic and 2E psionicist characters were practically spellcasters in all but name, just with a different resource management in manifesting/activating, relying on PSPs instead of Spell Slots, and the whole idea of power checks was from 2E, with 1E power activation just working if you could pay the points, and then either requiring a saving throw, or with attack/defense mode combat, a percent chance of success (basically a different kind of saving throw). 3E was more transparent in powers being analogous to spells, and 3.5 even more so. Complexity was always inherent in psionics, especially with 1E and 2E. 2E Psionicists could know up to 35 powers at level 20 - 2025 Psion caps out at 22 Spells, not counting any granted by their subclass, and 5E offers scalability on quite a few spells available to the new Psion. </p><p></p><p>It's definitely been much tougher to differentiate between Wizards, Psions, and Sorcerers, separate from all the other casters, because they have other clear abilities and niches that really highlight them - Warlocks have pact magic, pact abilities, and invocations, Druids have wild shape, bards have inspiration and their other bardic abilities, and so on. Sorcerers sort of have their niche abilities with sorcery points and subclasses, wizards are more defined by their reliance on spells and flexibilities in selecting them, and psions have an opportunity to carve their own niche with psi dice (less a mouthful than psionic energy dice, if the can abbreviate it), and subclass features based on disciplines. 3E pushed the scalability of psions by doing new psionic analogs of spells - half the time, they just pasted psionic in the front of the name, but a few times they did something new - Psionic Charm, for example, allowed higher point expenditure for more advanced versions of the charm spell (one power covered Charm Person, Charm Monster, Etc) - though 5E has done that with some spells (like Cure Wounds), others like Charm Person have multiple versions based on level - to make the Psion uniquely flexible, they could return to those roots and do scalable spells like Psionic Charm for the Psion List to allow some flexibility. Another thing to remove complexity and differentiate them from most casters could be to use the Warlock's spell slot advancement and short rest recovery (to emulate the faster power recuperation of 2E, for example), and maybe do devotion/science powers in place of invocations, for example?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheWriterFantastic™, post: 9672645, member: 88534"] I don't think the current version is even near perfect, but I think it's a good start - 1E psionic and 2E psionicist characters were practically spellcasters in all but name, just with a different resource management in manifesting/activating, relying on PSPs instead of Spell Slots, and the whole idea of power checks was from 2E, with 1E power activation just working if you could pay the points, and then either requiring a saving throw, or with attack/defense mode combat, a percent chance of success (basically a different kind of saving throw). 3E was more transparent in powers being analogous to spells, and 3.5 even more so. Complexity was always inherent in psionics, especially with 1E and 2E. 2E Psionicists could know up to 35 powers at level 20 - 2025 Psion caps out at 22 Spells, not counting any granted by their subclass, and 5E offers scalability on quite a few spells available to the new Psion. It's definitely been much tougher to differentiate between Wizards, Psions, and Sorcerers, separate from all the other casters, because they have other clear abilities and niches that really highlight them - Warlocks have pact magic, pact abilities, and invocations, Druids have wild shape, bards have inspiration and their other bardic abilities, and so on. Sorcerers sort of have their niche abilities with sorcery points and subclasses, wizards are more defined by their reliance on spells and flexibilities in selecting them, and psions have an opportunity to carve their own niche with psi dice (less a mouthful than psionic energy dice, if the can abbreviate it), and subclass features based on disciplines. 3E pushed the scalability of psions by doing new psionic analogs of spells - half the time, they just pasted psionic in the front of the name, but a few times they did something new - Psionic Charm, for example, allowed higher point expenditure for more advanced versions of the charm spell (one power covered Charm Person, Charm Monster, Etc) - though 5E has done that with some spells (like Cure Wounds), others like Charm Person have multiple versions based on level - to make the Psion uniquely flexible, they could return to those roots and do scalable spells like Psionic Charm for the Psion List to allow some flexibility. Another thing to remove complexity and differentiate them from most casters could be to use the Warlock's spell slot advancement and short rest recovery (to emulate the faster power recuperation of 2E, for example), and maybe do devotion/science powers in place of invocations, for example? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Psionics: What Do You Want?
Top