Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Psions, underpowered? Your experience?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr_Rictus" data-source="post: 233627" data-attributes="member: 850"><p>Just tweaking your nose a bit. You must admit that your original post was a bit over the top. I assure you, I did read it, but to me, trying to compete with the mages in terms of damage-dealing <em>is</em> the best way to "blow all your PP in a single combat and be useless for the rest of the game."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Me too. I can't tell you how sick I am of that. (Psi)SeveredHead in particular did an excellent job in clarifying my point about components (yes, it's the Verbal and Somatic ones that are particularly relevant to me) and armor (stacking magic armor and shield does become quite competetive with the wizards' protective spells). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Naturally. But providing logistical support (command and control, transport and evac) is a perfectly good way to participate in a combat. It's not to everyone's taste, but I do find it's something that psions do pretty well. The comparison to bards isn't really a bad one.</p><p></p><p>Regarding armor, I might also add that a psion who doesn't engage in much physical combat doesn't really necessarily care if he isn't proficient in his armor, and there are some neat armor enchantments that aren't commonly available through other items (at least not continuously). I think too many players just have a knee-jerk reaction about proficiency and don't look at what the actual penalty is, and whether they can tolerate it.</p><p></p><p>Regarding scrolls, wizards definitely have the lock here, but if you're playing by the ruling (promulgated by WotC, as I recall) that each spell counts as an item for purposes of the one-day minimum on making magic items, I doubt you're going to see your party wizard making dozens of scrolls of handy low-level spells. Wands are more the issue for that usage, and you do have a point there.</p><p></p><p>This last issue is one that's probably highly campaign-dependent. If psionics are presented as exotic even compared to magic, you're going to suffer from a reduced availability of items, and of NPC psions to cooperate in making such items. Personally I think that's a mistake, given the wild abandon with which many DM's seem to make spells available to wizards. If you're going for the "exotic" feel, I'd prefer a tight-knit subculture of psionics so your psions have the opportunity (available to sorcerers, if they're thinking) to fill some of the gaps in their power lists by cooperating with each other on power stones and dorjes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr_Rictus, post: 233627, member: 850"] Just tweaking your nose a bit. You must admit that your original post was a bit over the top. I assure you, I did read it, but to me, trying to compete with the mages in terms of damage-dealing [i]is[/i] the best way to "blow all your PP in a single combat and be useless for the rest of the game." Me too. I can't tell you how sick I am of that. (Psi)SeveredHead in particular did an excellent job in clarifying my point about components (yes, it's the Verbal and Somatic ones that are particularly relevant to me) and armor (stacking magic armor and shield does become quite competetive with the wizards' protective spells). Naturally. But providing logistical support (command and control, transport and evac) is a perfectly good way to participate in a combat. It's not to everyone's taste, but I do find it's something that psions do pretty well. The comparison to bards isn't really a bad one. Regarding armor, I might also add that a psion who doesn't engage in much physical combat doesn't really necessarily care if he isn't proficient in his armor, and there are some neat armor enchantments that aren't commonly available through other items (at least not continuously). I think too many players just have a knee-jerk reaction about proficiency and don't look at what the actual penalty is, and whether they can tolerate it. Regarding scrolls, wizards definitely have the lock here, but if you're playing by the ruling (promulgated by WotC, as I recall) that each spell counts as an item for purposes of the one-day minimum on making magic items, I doubt you're going to see your party wizard making dozens of scrolls of handy low-level spells. Wands are more the issue for that usage, and you do have a point there. This last issue is one that's probably highly campaign-dependent. If psionics are presented as exotic even compared to magic, you're going to suffer from a reduced availability of items, and of NPC psions to cooperate in making such items. Personally I think that's a mistake, given the wild abandon with which many DM's seem to make spells available to wizards. If you're going for the "exotic" feel, I'd prefer a tight-knit subculture of psionics so your psions have the opportunity (available to sorcerers, if they're thinking) to fill some of the gaps in their power lists by cooperating with each other on power stones and dorjes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Psions, underpowered? Your experience?
Top