Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Psions, underpowered? Your experience?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 241548" data-attributes="member: 1165"><p><em>Good point on the Crystal Capacitors, thats something cool that Arcaners don't get, and an ok perk. </em></p><p></p><p>I wasn't so brilliant, I'm afraid. They're like Pearls of Powers, but a little more flexible.</p><p></p><p><em>Thats no excuse to take out scaling though. </em></p><p></p><p>True, there should have been some sort of scaling. Unfortunately, there wasn't. That's why people use ITCK and the Mind's Eye.</p><p></p><p><em>The rest of your post basically says "Psions are TOO balanced! They are just as good as a Sorcerer, IFF they take this feat, that feat, use these rules, etc." Not very convincing I'm afraid.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p></p><p>Same as just above. Instead of feats, they should have been class features. However, in the end it's the same thing. Sort of like the high-level rogues special class abilities. Not every rogue will use the same ones (although in practice, all take Improved Evasion).</p><p></p><p><em>The Minds Eye? This isn't the House Rule forum. </em></p><p></p><p>The Mind's Eye is official. You can find it here: <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/article1.asp?x=dnd/psi/welcome,3" target="_blank">http://www.wizards.com/dnd/article1.asp?x=dnd/psi/welcome,3</a></p><p></p><p>Note the <a href="http://www.wizard.com" target="_blank">www.wizard.com</a> bit at the start. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>Mark Jindra has said that by the time the Mind's Eye ends, it will be bigger than the various classbooks released by Wizards. Since it's published by official Wizard's guys, it will also be better than most of the other classbooks (I'm sure the official Wizards guys never even looked sat Sword and Fist before it was published).</p><p></p><p><em>If they hadn't screwed up in the 1st place there wouldn't be a need for all these patches.</em></p><p></p><p>True, but they've admitted their mistake and are trying to fix it. I don't know whose fault it was, but I tend to blame WotC's deadline. Due to the unclarity of many of the published powers and the last minute "hey look, free scaling makes psions unbalanced", I think WotC should have let Bruce Cordell have more time. (Bruce Cordell's work in If Thoughts Could Kill was much clearer, when he had all the time he needed, so that's why I don't think Bruce was the problem.) I'm willing to wait (and even pay more) for quality.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="(Psi)SeveredHead, post: 241548, member: 1165"] [i]Good point on the Crystal Capacitors, thats something cool that Arcaners don't get, and an ok perk. [/i] I wasn't so brilliant, I'm afraid. They're like Pearls of Powers, but a little more flexible. [i]Thats no excuse to take out scaling though. [/i] True, there should have been some sort of scaling. Unfortunately, there wasn't. That's why people use ITCK and the Mind's Eye. [i]The rest of your post basically says "Psions are TOO balanced! They are just as good as a Sorcerer, IFF they take this feat, that feat, use these rules, etc." Not very convincing I'm afraid. [/i] Same as just above. Instead of feats, they should have been class features. However, in the end it's the same thing. Sort of like the high-level rogues special class abilities. Not every rogue will use the same ones (although in practice, all take Improved Evasion). [i]The Minds Eye? This isn't the House Rule forum. [/i] The Mind's Eye is official. You can find it here: [url]http://www.wizards.com/dnd/article1.asp?x=dnd/psi/welcome,3[/url] Note the [url]www.wizard.com[/url] bit at the start. ;) Mark Jindra has said that by the time the Mind's Eye ends, it will be bigger than the various classbooks released by Wizards. Since it's published by official Wizard's guys, it will also be better than most of the other classbooks (I'm sure the official Wizards guys never even looked sat Sword and Fist before it was published). [i]If they hadn't screwed up in the 1st place there wouldn't be a need for all these patches.[/i] True, but they've admitted their mistake and are trying to fix it. I don't know whose fault it was, but I tend to blame WotC's deadline. Due to the unclarity of many of the published powers and the last minute "hey look, free scaling makes psions unbalanced", I think WotC should have let Bruce Cordell have more time. (Bruce Cordell's work in If Thoughts Could Kill was much clearer, when he had all the time he needed, so that's why I don't think Bruce was the problem.) I'm willing to wait (and even pay more) for quality. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Psions, underpowered? Your experience?
Top