Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Pulse check on 1D&D excitement level
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 8952187" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>I agree with a lot of the design ideas they're making, but I have, overall, been very disappointed in their actual implementation of them.</p><p></p><p>Fixing the power imbalance of summoning and shapechanging? All for that. Actual implementation? <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😴" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f634.png" title="Sleeping face :sleeping:" data-shortname=":sleeping:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> I can't swim until what level? I can't fly until what level? Er, have you read the spell list, friends? Is Wild Shape supposed to be a primary feature or not?</p><p></p><p>Many of the other changes, like spell schools needing to matter (and still having three spell lists!), and the class groups, just feels like chart-filling being used as a crutch for game design. It feels like what it is. They don't have an idea for the fantasy of what each class should be anymore, so they're just shuffling through different iterations of the same design, peppering them at a different levels for variety, and going nowhere fast like <a href="https://youtu.be/6XvXsuSJ-1A" target="_blank">Daffy Duck struggling to escape the animator</a>.</p><p></p><p>Plus, they're pushing even more abilities even deeper into the class level structure. Part of it is more chart-filling-as-design, but even more is because multiclassing is a really, really stupid design. Stop nerfing the classes to make multiclassing less unbalanced, and just add real costs or penalties for multiclassing already! Or just drop it entirely! There's 12 classes and 48 subclasses! It's so much nonsense for that one thing to drive so much of the game's design. Give me a fleshed out character at the start of the game. Words cannot express how uninterested I remain at the idea of playing a War Cleric who doesn't know how to use a sword or armor until level 3 just because multiclass dipping is too good if you're a Sorcerer! And OneD&D is doubling down on that design. Now <em>nothing</em> from your subclass will be available until level 3 for <em>any</em> class. Everybody is generic until level 3 now.</p><p></p><p>It's like they've completely correctly identified the parts that are broken, but are otherwise doubling down on everything I didn't really like in 5e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 8952187, member: 6777737"] I agree with a lot of the design ideas they're making, but I have, overall, been very disappointed in their actual implementation of them. Fixing the power imbalance of summoning and shapechanging? All for that. Actual implementation? 😴 I can't swim until what level? I can't fly until what level? Er, have you read the spell list, friends? Is Wild Shape supposed to be a primary feature or not? Many of the other changes, like spell schools needing to matter (and still having three spell lists!), and the class groups, just feels like chart-filling being used as a crutch for game design. It feels like what it is. They don't have an idea for the fantasy of what each class should be anymore, so they're just shuffling through different iterations of the same design, peppering them at a different levels for variety, and going nowhere fast like [URL='https://youtu.be/6XvXsuSJ-1A']Daffy Duck struggling to escape the animator[/URL]. Plus, they're pushing even more abilities even deeper into the class level structure. Part of it is more chart-filling-as-design, but even more is because multiclassing is a really, really stupid design. Stop nerfing the classes to make multiclassing less unbalanced, and just add real costs or penalties for multiclassing already! Or just drop it entirely! There's 12 classes and 48 subclasses! It's so much nonsense for that one thing to drive so much of the game's design. Give me a fleshed out character at the start of the game. Words cannot express how uninterested I remain at the idea of playing a War Cleric who doesn't know how to use a sword or armor until level 3 just because multiclass dipping is too good if you're a Sorcerer! And OneD&D is doubling down on that design. Now [I]nothing[/I] from your subclass will be available until level 3 for [I]any[/I] class. Everybody is generic until level 3 now. It's like they've completely correctly identified the parts that are broken, but are otherwise doubling down on everything I didn't really like in 5e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Pulse check on 1D&D excitement level
Top