Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Benjamin Olson" data-source="post: 8952665" data-attributes="member: 6988941">It is easy to forget amidst playtests of such vigorous (and needless) class remixing, three or four different takes on inspiration, and that one time they threatened to make critical hits both radically less important and radically more complicated, that it really looks like the core rules are mostly untouched. I think being able to have people at the same table use different PHBs actually sounds more plausible to me now than it did a couple of playtests back.I have no intention of ever playing OneD&D, but for all the things that irritate or outright offend me about its class redesigns, I don't see anything that I would, as a fellow player of DM, object to some other player bringing to the table, as long as they are a player with high rules literacy who is sharp about policing themself.Now if it's some newbie who wants me to help them figure out which of the massive, unwieldy list of Arcane spells their OneD&D Bard can prepare.... or that person at so many tables who just can never keep straight basic things like the action economy or what bonus is what... I'm going to gently encourage them to convert the character to the system I understand.</blockquote>