Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Push+Wall=save
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goumindong" data-source="post: 4480765" data-attributes="member: 70874"><p>Then refute the argument. The statement that defines what the post is going to discuss is not the argument.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Custserv is not an authority. I do have RAW support for my argument. As much as you want to say that it is not so, you have provided no argument whatsoever to the contrary. If my argument is incorrect then there must be something within the argument that is false, or some counter point that can be discussed.</p><p></p><p>Why can you not produce it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank your for the non sequitur. Would you care to rejoin the discussion?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The two sentences are identical in meaning within the context we are discussing. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It <em>is</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And i am saying stop being disingenuous. You know what was said and what was meant, you are delaying and bringing up <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> that is irrelevant to the discussion because you have no argument.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You forgot option C. "A common way to make a comparison between two similar concepts"</p><p></p><p> Flaming sphere does not deal damage upon entering it. The object instead deals automatic damage once per round. This is very much functionally different than the spaces within a wall of fire. Where the space within a wall of fire deals damage upon entering it. This is why the wall of fire itself is hindering terrain[it is a square that damages] and the adjacent area next to it is not[it is a square that the wall of fire deals damage to]. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually it is a very small mobile zone that happens to follow the zone rules except where the specifics of the power and the differences between the zone and conjuration are applied. Should you know the differences between zones and conjurations you would know what this means for the power.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goumindong, post: 4480765, member: 70874"] Then refute the argument. The statement that defines what the post is going to discuss is not the argument. Custserv is not an authority. I do have RAW support for my argument. As much as you want to say that it is not so, you have provided no argument whatsoever to the contrary. If my argument is incorrect then there must be something within the argument that is false, or some counter point that can be discussed. Why can you not produce it? Thank your for the non sequitur. Would you care to rejoin the discussion? The two sentences are identical in meaning within the context we are discussing. It [i]is[/i] And i am saying stop being disingenuous. You know what was said and what was meant, you are delaying and bringing up :):):):) that is irrelevant to the discussion because you have no argument. You forgot option C. "A common way to make a comparison between two similar concepts" Flaming sphere does not deal damage upon entering it. The object instead deals automatic damage once per round. This is very much functionally different than the spaces within a wall of fire. Where the space within a wall of fire deals damage upon entering it. This is why the wall of fire itself is hindering terrain[it is a square that damages] and the adjacent area next to it is not[it is a square that the wall of fire deals damage to]. Actually it is a very small mobile zone that happens to follow the zone rules except where the specifics of the power and the differences between the zone and conjuration are applied. Should you know the differences between zones and conjurations you would know what this means for the power. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Push+Wall=save
Top