Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Q&A: Basic Subclass, Can Subclasses Change the class, Non-Vancian Subclasses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6129882" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Sounds like the design vision behind Pathfinder Archetypes. I like the idea and hopefully they can pull it off in a balanced, precise way such that each subclass is legitimized. They will, of course have to deal with micro-balance functionality with respect to sub-class features given the potential interactions with a la carte multiclassing. Their statement of </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> may be difficult to square depending on how the multiclass system works itself out. Further, if you buy into a subclass "not at all", what does that mean...a stock feature instead?</p><p></p><p>I do particularly like their rendering of the "essential Fighter" as </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>However, for this to be legitimized, you're going to have to have Fighters either actually have a reason to use multiple weapons (a la carte effects/riders triggered upon weapon used) or the ability to leverage multiple styles/martial arts rather than just one; eg extreme mobility/skirmishing coupled with heavy melee control and (rather than vs) AoE berserking and (rather than vs) defensive stalwart who is a wall unto himself. This is one thing I loved about the 4e fighter in play. He defaulted to a focused chassis, but one that was "and" with respect to all of the above rather than "vs" and could be specialized or broadened further to your taste.</p><p></p><p>The reinforcement of the necessary non-combat functionality (skills or proficiencies) of the Fighter is heartening; eg more than "press attack buttan and then press drink, wench and crush tankard buttan".</p><p></p><p>If you can truly insert a <em>considerable </em>number of subclass features onto each the chassis of each class, then they should be able to realize many of the classes with an intensely robust subclass system. If its "unplug horsie mount and plug in stag" and "unplug divine spells and plug in druid spells" to get a Warden out of a Paladin, then there will assuredly be something rotten in Denmark.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6129882, member: 6696971"] Sounds like the design vision behind Pathfinder Archetypes. I like the idea and hopefully they can pull it off in a balanced, precise way such that each subclass is legitimized. They will, of course have to deal with micro-balance functionality with respect to sub-class features given the potential interactions with a la carte multiclassing. Their statement of may be difficult to square depending on how the multiclass system works itself out. Further, if you buy into a subclass "not at all", what does that mean...a stock feature instead? I do particularly like their rendering of the "essential Fighter" as However, for this to be legitimized, you're going to have to have Fighters either actually have a reason to use multiple weapons (a la carte effects/riders triggered upon weapon used) or the ability to leverage multiple styles/martial arts rather than just one; eg extreme mobility/skirmishing coupled with heavy melee control and (rather than vs) AoE berserking and (rather than vs) defensive stalwart who is a wall unto himself. This is one thing I loved about the 4e fighter in play. He defaulted to a focused chassis, but one that was "and" with respect to all of the above rather than "vs" and could be specialized or broadened further to your taste. The reinforcement of the necessary non-combat functionality (skills or proficiencies) of the Fighter is heartening; eg more than "press attack buttan and then press drink, wench and crush tankard buttan". If you can truly insert a [I]considerable [/I]number of subclass features onto each the chassis of each class, then they should be able to realize many of the classes with an intensely robust subclass system. If its "unplug horsie mount and plug in stag" and "unplug divine spells and plug in druid spells" to get a Warden out of a Paladin, then there will assuredly be something rotten in Denmark. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Q&A: Basic Subclass, Can Subclasses Change the class, Non-Vancian Subclasses
Top