Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Q&A: Mage Cantrips, Multiclass req., and the Psion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 6199241" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>Exactly. In addition: </p><p></p><p>There has always been a weird mini-game for mages (wizards, M-Us) involving the spellbook. Clerics (e.g.) can draw from their list freely, but Mages need to have a spell in their spellbook. And so there is a mini-game of the wizard building the spellbook (assuming the DM cares) and making and hiding a backup; the DM maybe threatening the book, whatever. Mages need to look for spells, invest gold and time copying things out. If played RAW, it means levelling up on a long campaign is tougher for mages uniquely. </p><p></p><p>It may be some for some players, but it always marks the wizard as "other" -- and so the minigame often (IME) does not get played; it's a distraction for one, and not fun for the table.</p><p></p><p>What is the justification for its existence? Only the superior strength and versatility of the spells on the spellcaster's list (which some would question): it's a balancing mechanism, one that is often ignored. (Additional problems emerge with classes like the 3.x sorcerer, which lacks the book but casts arcane spells, and therefore has a hard limit on spells absent from wizards).</p><p></p><p>So, this answer has a number of undesirable effects:</p><p>a. undermines race and feat powers </p><p>b. gives mages access to all cantrips without mechanical cost (there may be an in-game cost for those playing the minigame), something that's not available to other zero-level-spell-users. </p><p>c. removes one aspect of the balancing mechanism without a commensurate decrease in effectiveness of other spells in the list.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 6199241, member: 23484"] Exactly. In addition: There has always been a weird mini-game for mages (wizards, M-Us) involving the spellbook. Clerics (e.g.) can draw from their list freely, but Mages need to have a spell in their spellbook. And so there is a mini-game of the wizard building the spellbook (assuming the DM cares) and making and hiding a backup; the DM maybe threatening the book, whatever. Mages need to look for spells, invest gold and time copying things out. If played RAW, it means levelling up on a long campaign is tougher for mages uniquely. It may be some for some players, but it always marks the wizard as "other" -- and so the minigame often (IME) does not get played; it's a distraction for one, and not fun for the table. What is the justification for its existence? Only the superior strength and versatility of the spells on the spellcaster's list (which some would question): it's a balancing mechanism, one that is often ignored. (Additional problems emerge with classes like the 3.x sorcerer, which lacks the book but casts arcane spells, and therefore has a hard limit on spells absent from wizards). So, this answer has a number of undesirable effects: a. undermines race and feat powers b. gives mages access to all cantrips without mechanical cost (there may be an in-game cost for those playing the minigame), something that's not available to other zero-level-spell-users. c. removes one aspect of the balancing mechanism without a commensurate decrease in effectiveness of other spells in the list. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Q&A: Mage Cantrips, Multiclass req., and the Psion
Top