Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 1112475" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>I don't think the sky's falling <em>quite</em> yet, thanks. I personally don't know the rationale behind this new provision, and I don't think it's a good idea. But it does <em>not</em> spell the end of the D20 License in any way, shape, or form.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it includes the term "sole discretion." It also includes guidelines, and any termination that doesn't follow those guidelines can be successfully challenged. Further, I seriously doubt WotC is looking for a reason to crack down, since they've always been very quick to give people permission to go above and beyond the limits of OGC, when asked politely.</p><p></p><p>This new provision does open the door to <em>potential</em> abuse, sure. But a deliberate crackdown is not only out of character, it would require further modification of the license. And if they <em>were</em> to start cracking down on companies for suspicious reasons, word of that would get out pretty quick too. This is not the end as we know it; it's a bump in the road, an aggravation for some people, and--in my personal, admittedly not-fully-informed opinion--not a good idea. But it's not a disaster by any stretch of the imagination.</p><p></p><p>What this means is that people who are putting out something they feel might be close to the line will probably choose the better part of valor, and go OGL rather than D20. For the <em>vast</em> majority of products, which don't come anywhere near that line, it's going to be business as normal. The fact is, even in a worst-case scenario, WotC has no <em>reason</em> to nix most products, since none of the D20 companies have either the distribution or name recognition to serve as actual competition. I agree with Ryan Dancy that the wording of the provision is potentially abusive, but I really don't believe there's any risk involved for the vast majority of companies or products.</p><p></p><p>I'm all for discussion, and I'm all for letting WotC know--politely--that we disagree with this. But let's try to keep it in perspective; a situation like this is the <em>last</em> place where histrionics are going to help.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 1112475, member: 1288"] I don't think the sky's falling [i]quite[/i] yet, thanks. I personally don't know the rationale behind this new provision, and I don't think it's a good idea. But it does [i]not[/i] spell the end of the D20 License in any way, shape, or form. Yes, it includes the term "sole discretion." It also includes guidelines, and any termination that doesn't follow those guidelines can be successfully challenged. Further, I seriously doubt WotC is looking for a reason to crack down, since they've always been very quick to give people permission to go above and beyond the limits of OGC, when asked politely. This new provision does open the door to [i]potential[/i] abuse, sure. But a deliberate crackdown is not only out of character, it would require further modification of the license. And if they [i]were[/i] to start cracking down on companies for suspicious reasons, word of that would get out pretty quick too. This is not the end as we know it; it's a bump in the road, an aggravation for some people, and--in my personal, admittedly not-fully-informed opinion--not a good idea. But it's not a disaster by any stretch of the imagination. What this means is that people who are putting out something they feel might be close to the line will probably choose the better part of valor, and go OGL rather than D20. For the [i]vast[/i] majority of products, which don't come anywhere near that line, it's going to be business as normal. The fact is, even in a worst-case scenario, WotC has no [i]reason[/i] to nix most products, since none of the D20 companies have either the distribution or name recognition to serve as actual competition. I agree with Ryan Dancy that the wording of the provision is potentially abusive, but I really don't believe there's any risk involved for the vast majority of companies or products. I'm all for discussion, and I'm all for letting WotC know--politely--that we disagree with this. But let's try to keep it in perspective; a situation like this is the [i]last[/i] place where histrionics are going to help. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
Top