Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 1113129" data-attributes="member: 6777"><p>Amen.</p><p></p><p>I'm not nuts about the change, but it seems pretty obvious that it's a specific response to Valar. That is, WotC obviously wants the *option* to block products like the BoEF from associating itself too closely with trademarks that are their bread and butter. It's quite possible that this or the possibile publication of FATAL or RAHOWA d20 would be the only cases in which they would exercise their rights (which would not stop their publication, only their use of certain trademarks).</p><p></p><p>Thoughtful comments of our august moderator aside (re: what will future management do with this new language in the license?), I think claims that WotC is going to use these new rights to stop publication of products with obvious merit like Testament, Afghanistan d20, or any of the other chicken-little examples that have been given are totally ridiculous. As Dancey himself said, exercising these new rights is potentially very costly, so I can't see WotC wasting the money on anything but the most grevious examples. E.g., Harriet Tubman d20: no, Nazi Hardcore Necrophilia Illustrated d20: yes.</p><p></p><p>And nothing is written in stone. They changed the license. If it starts to adversely affect their business (a longshot), they'll change it again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzz, post: 1113129, member: 6777"] Amen. I'm not nuts about the change, but it seems pretty obvious that it's a specific response to Valar. That is, WotC obviously wants the *option* to block products like the BoEF from associating itself too closely with trademarks that are their bread and butter. It's quite possible that this or the possibile publication of FATAL or RAHOWA d20 would be the only cases in which they would exercise their rights (which would not stop their publication, only their use of certain trademarks). Thoughtful comments of our august moderator aside (re: what will future management do with this new language in the license?), I think claims that WotC is going to use these new rights to stop publication of products with obvious merit like Testament, Afghanistan d20, or any of the other chicken-little examples that have been given are totally ridiculous. As Dancey himself said, exercising these new rights is potentially very costly, so I can't see WotC wasting the money on anything but the most grevious examples. E.g., Harriet Tubman d20: no, Nazi Hardcore Necrophilia Illustrated d20: yes. And nothing is written in stone. They changed the license. If it starts to adversely affect their business (a longshot), they'll change it again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
Top